Regarding the Shibarium bridge incident and the subsequent review process: there's been ongoing discussion about which independent forensic firm was actually retained to conduct the technical assessment. Given the critical nature of bridge security in the Web3 ecosystem, transparency around the audit process is essential. The independent evaluation of what went wrong—whether it was smart contract vulnerabilities, operational procedures, or infrastructure weaknesses—needs proper documentation. This raises a broader point about how projects communicate their incident response and third-party verification steps. Knowing which reputable security firm handled the forensic analysis helps the community understand the depth and credibility of the assessment.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 2
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
IntrovertMetaversevip
· 2025-12-23 22:20
It's both an audit and forensic, and after talking for a long time, it's still unclear who did the bridge. Blockchain security really needs some clarity; we don't want another unfinished story. As for this third-party endorsement, it depends on who it is. Endorsement from a big company is completely different from an audit by a roadside society.
View OriginalReply0
ContractExplorervip
· 2025-12-23 06:47
Another bridge security incident, what kind of trouble has Shiba Inu caused this time Wait, which auditing company is responsible? Why does it feel like they are squeezing toothpaste to get the information out Is it a smart contracts vulnerability or an operational issue? The blame for these two is quite different As for transparency, Web3 has never really done it, you know that right
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt