2025-12-22 14:20:27

Recently, the international trade pattern is quietly changing. Several major countries in Central Asia have signed a series of large orders with Japan, involving infrastructure investment, resource cooperation, etc., with amounts that are staggering—just the protocol for one country is close to 4 billion USD, and combined with private investment, the scale reaches the trillion yen level. This is not just a political game; it reflects a real issue behind it: when funds and goods flow on a large scale internationally, what will be used to complete the Settlement?

Although the traditional dollar system is universal, issues such as exchange rate fluctuations, political risks, and high cross-border transaction fees remain persistent problems. Settling in local currency sounds ideal, but efficiency and liquidity cannot keep up. Against this backdrop, a digital stablecoin with clearly defined technical characteristics and controllable risks has become a practical necessity.

Why do you say that? Take products like USDD for example - a collateralization rate of over 130% means that reserves are sufficient, and on-chain data is transparent and verifiable, without black box operations. Deployed on an efficient public blockchain, cross-border transfer costs are extremely low, and settlement speed is fast. For institutions participating in international trade, this characteristic is indeed appealing: faster capital flow, lower costs, and clearer risks.

Imagine a future scenario: minerals are shipped from Central Asia to Europe, settled using stablecoins; payments from Europe are sent back, also completed using stablecoins. The entire process is transparent, efficient, and low-cost, allowing all parties to track the status of funds in real time. This is actually a significant advantage for businesses and institutions involved in international trade. As cross-border business activities become more frequent, the practical value of such tools will become increasingly prominent.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DoomCanister

· 2025-12-25 12:50

The dollar system is indeed outdated, and stablecoins will eventually become the mainstream tool for trade settlement.

View OriginalReply0

PhantomHunter

· 2025-12-23 05:10

Wow, this logic seems a bit forced... If there are issues with the dollar system, is it really just about jumping straight to stablecoins? Are they really considering this in Central Asia? To put it bluntly, they are still looking for application scenarios. There are indeed pain points in trade settlement, but using stablecoins? We need to first see if the governments of various countries are on board.

View OriginalReply0

PumpStrategist

· 2025-12-22 16:14

A 130% collateral sounds nice, but what about when the moment of liquidity pressure arrives? The chip distribution shows that Large Investors have already cashed out at high levels.

View OriginalReply0

degenonymous

· 2025-12-22 14:50

Wait, can this logic of USDD really be implemented? It feels like I'm thinking too much.

View OriginalReply0

blocksnark

· 2025-12-22 14:34

The US dollar system is so fragile that it's time to change our thinking; stablecoins indeed have potential. --- Haha, wait a minute, can we really trust a 130% collateralization ratio? On-chain transparency ≠ no accidents. --- In terms of trade settlement, stablecoins will eventually take over; the places where Uncle Sam has no control are opportunities. --- The cooperation between Central Asia and Japan is interesting; is it hinting at something, or is it purely commercial logic? --- The low cost of cross-border transfers is not a new selling point; the key is who dares to use it on a large scale. --- Is USDD collateral sufficient? I haven't seen an audit report. --- I feel that stablecoins ultimately have to take a political stance; no matter how good the technical characteristics are, they cannot escape this. --- The scenario of mining in Europe is too ideal; real trade is never that smooth. --- I've heard enough about on-chain transparency; what about actual implementation? --- This is what web3 should be doing; stop just cryptocurrency trading.

View OriginalReply0

MetaMaximalist

· 2025-12-22 14:27

ngl the 130% collateralization thing is textbook risk management theater... adoption curves don't move on spreadsheets alone tbh

Reply0

MemeEchoer

· 2025-12-22 14:26

To be honest, a 130% collateralization rate sounds good, but can we really trust the on-chain transparency? It’s true that settling with stablecoins is more appealing than USD, but cross-border fees haven't really moved. Can USDD gain traction this time? It still depends on whether institutions are on board. Switching to a different settlement tool for international trade isn't that simple, right? I just want to know when it will actually be used instead of just being talked about. Japan's recent moves are quite interesting, subtly pushing for de-dollarization? Will low cross-border transfer costs be enough to make it take off? I’m afraid that might be wishful thinking.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropBlackHole

· 2025-12-22 14:25

Ha, finally someone noticed, the USD trap really can't last much longer. This wave of stablecoins does have potential, but the key is that someone has to believe in it. The collateral rate for USDD looks good on paper, just afraid of another Black Swan Event... Cross-chain Settlement should have been popularized long ago, the efficiency is way too low. But speaking of which, central banks around the world certainly won't be happy, how could these people just sit and wait?

View OriginalReply0

ChainSpy

· 2025-12-22 14:24

Is the USD harvesting coming to an end? Haha, finally seeing something interesting this time. Will stablecoins really become new settlement tools? I just want to know how the Central Banks of various countries view this. Central Asia is playing this game fairly well, but it still depends on whether it can truly land. The cost of cross-chain settlement is indeed low, but who will bear the trust issue? Using stablecoins for mineral trade... if this really happens, it would be interesting. The 130% collateral rate for USDD sounds good, but how can we ensure there won't be any tricks again? Is the international trade system going to change? Can we retail investors really benefit? It sounds good, but we still need to see when the major institutions will actually use it. I believe in the efficiency and low cost, but how big will the political resistance be? For now, the USD is still king; how long will it take for stablecoins to replace it?

View OriginalReply0