Hyperliquid Labs clarifies shorting incident: it belongs to a former employee account, validators' votes are about to determine life and death.

robot
Abstract generation in progress

[Coin World] Regarding the suspicious wallet that shorted HYPE discovered by the community, Hyperliquid Labs has recently provided an explanation — this Address actually belongs to a former employee who left in the first quarter of 2024.

This clarification statement comes at a timely moment. With December 24th coming to an end, the validator votes are about to be finalized, and the weight of this vote is significant - it involves the permanent destruction of nearly $1 billion worth of HYPE tokens from circulation.

From a temporal perspective, the tension between the insider trading allegations and the official clarifications has indeed sparked considerable discussion. On one hand, there is community oversight of on-chain trading behaviors, while on the other hand, there is the project team's responsibility for the actions of former employees. This also reflects the balance issue of transparency and trust within the DEX ecosystem—while all on-chain operations are visible, the interpretation of information and judgment of motives still require clear responses from official sources.

HYPE-1,95%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BlockBargainHuntervip
· 2025-12-25 05:02
Former employee accounts? This clarification is a bit hasty. Who can prove that the wallet is not under their control?
View OriginalReply0
LightningLadyvip
· 2025-12-22 23:16
Hmm... the reason of the resigned employee account sounds a bit familiar, do you always say this?
View OriginalReply0
ApeShotFirstvip
· 2025-12-22 09:10
Resigned employees? Haha, that's really ridiculous, this excuse is too... Validators voting to determine life and death? Just waiting to watch the show.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinSkepticvip
· 2025-12-22 09:07
Former employees passing the buck, who would believe this trap... validators voting is the real exam moment.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropATMvip
· 2025-12-22 09:04
Former employee account? This excuse is too convenient, it's always this trap... What can the validators' votes change? The on-chain data cannot be tampered with.
View OriginalReply0
StableNomadvip
· 2025-12-22 09:02
ah yeah, "离职员工钱包"... statistically speaking that's what they always say. reminds me of UST in May when everyone suddenly had an explanation ready. not financial advice but the timing on these clarifications is... suspiciously convenient lol
Reply0
RugDocScientistvip
· 2025-12-22 09:00
Resigned employee wallet? Uh... this term sounds a bit suspicious to me.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)