Can Toronto's Backcourt Experiment Actually Work With Three Star Wings?

robot
Abstract generation in progress

The Toronto Raptors find themselves in a peculiar situation entering the new season. After acquiring Brandon Ingram at the deadline and subsequently locking him into a $40 million annually, the franchise now juggles three significant perimeter talents: Ingram, Scottie Barnes, and RJ Barrett. The math doesn’t add up—at least not on paper. While these three could theoretically share the floor in limited stretches, realistic minutes distribution suggests the organization will need to make a tough call down the line.

The Elephant in the Room: Who Stays?

Given that Barnes represents the franchise cornerstone and Ingram is still proving his fit, RJ Barrett appears the most expendable piece. If Toronto does move him, they’d be making a calculated bet that Ingram’s scoring prowess and Barnes’s versatility can anchor the roster without the playmaking dimension Barrett provides.

What the Raptors Actually Need if They Move Barrett

Should Barrett hit the trade market, Toronto would need to address specific gaps:

Floor Spacing Becomes Essential

With neither Barnes nor Ingram naturally gravitating toward three-point shooting, the Raptors should prioritize wing talent who can stretch defenses. Coby White from Chicago represents an intriguing option at $12.8 million in salary, making a deal more feasible than pursuing Boston’s Derrick White ($28.1 million). A true off-guard who doesn’t demand ball-handling responsibilities would complement their core, even alongside Gradey Dick.

Size and Frontcourt Balance

While Jakob Pöltl has developed offensively, adding a legitimate floor-spacing power forward or center with NBA-caliber size would give Barnes and Ingram more freedom as primary scoring options rather than constantly shouldering playmaking burdens.

What Teams Should Know About RJ Barrett

Anyone considering trading for Barrett must understand both his ceiling and constraints. His relocation from New York transformed his role entirely. As a guard in the Knicks system, he faced quicker defenders and played a different game. Toronto reimagined him as a forward—specifically a playmaking four rather than an off-ball shooting guard.

This positional shift unlocked significant gains. His scoring efficiency improved, his overall impact expanded, and his playmaking became a more central tool. At 6’6", Barrett functions better as a secondary creator and slasher than as a traditional shooting guard.

The obvious limitation remains his shot-making ability, which could suppress his market value. However, for teams seeking a playmaker, forward, and positional flexibility, Barrett offers legitimate value when deployed correctly.

The real question isn’t whether Barrett can perform—it’s whether Toronto wants to commit to this three-wing experiment or reset the approach.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
No comments
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)