The latest move by Hyperliquid Foundation has sparked controversy. Some community members openly expressed strong opposition, believing that this decision should be completely changed. This reflects the community's deep concern about the direction of the foundation and their direct opinions on project governance.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
22 Likes
Reward
22
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
0xOverleveraged
· 12-20 07:23
I don't quite agree with this decision; it seems like the foundation is messing around again.
View OriginalReply0
TradingNightmare
· 12-17 10:50
Is it the same old story? The HL Foundation always pulls this stunt, and it's all for nothing if the community gets discouraged.
View OriginalReply0
DogeBachelor
· 12-17 10:48
Another internal conflict, HL really messed up this time.
View OriginalReply0
RugpullTherapist
· 12-17 10:39
You're causing trouble again. The Hyperliquid foundation will crash sooner or later.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-6bc33122
· 12-17 10:36
Oh no, what kind of trouble are you causing now? Hyperliquid's operations are really unsustainable.
---
With such strong opposition, why not change? Wasn't the promise of decentralization?
---
The community is already upset, and you're still forcing it through. Is this Web3 governance?
---
Wait, where exactly did this decision go wrong... I need to take a closer look.
---
Come on, the foundation is always one person calling the shots.
---
I just want to know when the community's voice will truly be heard.
---
Doing things this way now will only lead to problems sooner or later. Don't say I didn't warn you.
The latest move by Hyperliquid Foundation has sparked controversy. Some community members openly expressed strong opposition, believing that this decision should be completely changed. This reflects the community's deep concern about the direction of the foundation and their direct opinions on project governance.