The success of Ethereum largely stems from the fact that launching a token project at that time required significant capital investment. Although this threshold seems simple, it actually served as a natural filter—only developers with genuine ideas were willing to spend money to try, rather than following trends casually. Objectively speaking, this cost structure also naturally raised the barrier to market participation. In other words, although the token ecosystem of that era was niche, the quality of participants was relatively higher.

ETH1,07%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
OnlyUpOnlyvip
· 2025-12-18 10:15
I wish I had known earlier. Back then, only true builders could participate, but now it's all just air projects piling up.
View OriginalReply0
MEVictimvip
· 2025-12-17 17:01
The high threshold has actually filtered out genuine projects. Now, there are sh*tcoins everywhere, haha.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropATMvip
· 2025-12-16 22:50
In other words, that early wave was indeed an elite circle filtered through money.
View OriginalReply0
CrossChainBreathervip
· 2025-12-16 22:35
That's right. The early wave of people really poured in real money, and now there's garbage coins everywhere with zero startup costs.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseMortgagevip
· 2025-12-16 22:24
Early Ethereum really relied on high barriers to filter out spam projects. Now, everywhere you see zero-cost copy-and-paste smart contracts, it has long since become spoiled.
View OriginalReply0
LightningPacketLossvip
· 2025-12-16 22:21
High entry costs have actually filtered out genuine players. Now that the threshold is so low that anyone can issue a token, no wonder there are trash projects everywhere.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin