The contest for Federal Reserve Chair suddenly faces a twist: the "live campaign" of two Kevins

robot
Abstract generation in progress

[BlockBeats] The selection of the Federal Reserve Chairman sparks new waves. The originally favored Haskett has come under suspicion from top officials for “being too close to the President,” and his position is no longer secure. Ironically, he was initially the strongest candidate to succeed Powell precisely because of his close relationship with Trump.

The turning point occurred last week. Trump first disclosed that a candidate had been locked in, then changed his tune in an interview—former Fed Governor Wosh has now also become a final candidate. This shift was immediately reflected in the prediction markets.

Data speaks for itself. On the Kalshi platform, Haskett’s probability of being elected dropped from over 80% at the beginning of the month to the current 51%; Wosh’s probability surged from 11% in early December to 44%. JPMorgan Chase CEO Dimon further boosted Wosh’s momentum with a statement on Thursday—although he praised both candidates as outstanding, his tone seemed to favor the former governor.

“Both Kevins are excellent,” Trump simply commented. But the market detected an implied meaning. The rescheduling of candidate interviews after they were canceled in early December is likely the result of this undercurrent. For investors, the policy stance of the Fed Chair directly affects financial markets. The final outcome of this “Kevin rivalry” may be more important than you think.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
AltcoinTherapistvip
· 2025-12-17 15:22
Hassett was backstabbed in this wave... Originally, it was because it was too close, but it was done because it was too close, when will Trump's backward problem be changed
View OriginalReply0
VCsSuckMyLiquidityvip
· 2025-12-17 10:00
Wow, that turnaround was so quick. In just a week, it dropped from 80% to 51%. Trump, you just can't seem to fix your flip-flopping problem, huh?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityNinjavip
· 2025-12-15 16:43
Damn, Trump's move is really clever. First he says it's locked in, then he changes his tune, and the market prediction just follows suit. That's reality. Wash jumped from 11% to 44%, like a roller coaster.
View OriginalReply0
PumpAnalystvip
· 2025-12-15 16:40
Hassett's sharp drop from 80% straight down to 51% is really something... The promised stability was supposed to be there, but then it was slapped in the face. I know this routine too well, just like cutting leeks [thinking] Wosh's share jumped from 11% to 44%. As soon as the Kalshi data came out, the market maker's intentions were so obvious? But on the other hand, Trump's change of tone indeed gave some room. Everyone should be careful not to be fooled. Damon's comment "Both Kevins are excellent," haha, I can hear the implied meaning. The mysticism of the financial circle, brother. If the support level can't hold, it's time to take profits.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhilosophervip
· 2025-12-15 16:31
Hassett's move this time is really brilliant. First, he was selected because of close connections, then he was questioned for the same reason... I'm truly bewildered by this logic. Wosh suddenly surged up, and Damon's words clearly hint at something, doesn't it? The prediction market is the most reliable, the data is right here. It seems Trump hasn't really figured out what to do about the Federal Reserve Chairmanship.
View OriginalReply0
Degen4Breakfastvip
· 2025-12-15 16:29
Hasset, this guy really has good luck. Having close connections, which are usually an advantage, instead become a disadvantage. The old folks at the Federal Reserve just can't get enough of playing these political games.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin