The Zama Creator Program Season 5 suddenly concludes early, revealing the real reason behind it

robot
Abstract generation in progress

【CryptoWorld】The Zama official team has recently made an important adjustment, deciding to end the Creator Program Season 5 early. Simply put, where is the problem? The rampant activity of bots and low-quality AI spam messages have ruined the user experience. Maintaining a healthy community ecosystem these days is indeed challenging.

But the good news is that Zama’s official team has explicitly stated that the size of the reward pool remains unchanged, only the schedule has been adjusted. The leaderboard will be shared with everyone soon. The official also confirmed a key date — the snapshot for Season 5 was locked in at 23:59 on December 14 (world time), which means participant data has already been recorded.

The next steps are also clear: the rankings for Season 5 and all previous seasons will be announced shortly. It seems Zama is taking this issue seriously by proactively adjusting to control the ecosystem quality, and this decisive attitude is worth commendation.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NotGonnaMakeItvip
· 2025-12-16 03:20
Robots and spam have ruined the good community, which is a bit annoying... But at least the reward pool hasn't decreased, so it's a silver lining in the misfortune. To be honest, Zama's response this time was quite quick, much better than some other projects. The snapshot was locked on December 14th, so we'll see how the leaderboard ranks, looking forward to it.
View OriginalReply0
0xLuckboxvip
· 2025-12-15 13:26
The proliferation of bots is really overwhelming. A good community was ruined by spam messages. Zama's timely stop-loss was okay. As for the reward pool, just keep it unchanged; the snapshots are already locked. Waiting for the leaderboard will be the final step. Ending early is frustrating, but it's better than continuing to decline... Ecosystem maintenance is just such a hassle.
View OriginalReply0
ClassicDumpstervip
· 2025-12-15 13:25
Robots and spam are overwhelming, it's really disgusting. Zama's timely stop-loss this time is okay. The reward pool hasn't changed, but the key is when the leaderboard will be released. Talking nicely is no substitute for actual results. Snapshot lock on December 14th? Feels like someone is going to cry again. Has anyone checked if there's any wash trading? Is this what you call ecosystem building? If you can't block robots, you have to cut quarterly rewards. Feels like it's getting more and more chaotic. Hurry up and announce the leaderboard; waiting every day is nerve-wracking.
View OriginalReply0
Layer3Dreamervip
· 2025-12-15 13:16
theoretically speaking, if we model zk-proof spam as a recursive constraint problem... the snapshot mechanics here are actually pretty elegant. reminds me of vitalik's writings on state verification, particularly how cross-rollup consistency requires that exact kind of timestamp immutability.
Reply0
ImpermanentPhilosophervip
· 2025-12-15 13:11
Robots and spam messages have ruined it. Ultimately, it's an issue of ecosystem governance, but at least the official team is sincere in not reducing rewards. Oh my, this is why I dislike these automated accounts—destroying a community is so easy. Locked on December 14th? Why didn't I notice? Looks like I need to pay more attention to official updates. Wait, no, ending early—good or bad for us participants? Who knows... Zama's move this time shows some brains; much better than some projects just digging pits.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropNinjavip
· 2025-12-15 13:07
A bunch of bots, so we have to end early, there's no other way. --- The snapshot has already been locked, just waiting for the leaderboard to be released. The fact that the reward pool hasn't decreased is actually a good thing. --- Rather than letting garbage information continue to pollute, if you cut it off decisively, I give Zama's move a thumbs up. --- Speaking of which, how many truly active creators have there been over these few seasons? --- The snapshot date of December 14th was probably set a long time ago, but it's a bit abrupt to mention it now. --- The most important thing is that the reward pool remains unchanged. Just for that, I have to give a thumbs up. Don’t pull that shrinking trick.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin