2025-12-12 13:29:53

Almanak's Fish Three Ways strategy ultimately resulted in a complete loss. The IPO project failed to launch successfully, so let's do some quick math for everyone.

Regarding costs: Early promotional investments basically had no cost; time is money. YouTube marketing cost over $1000. Later, before the price dropped to zero, I managed to recover a little, but the exact amount is hard to calculate.

In terms of revenue, I only received 11850 × 0.044 = $521.

The conclusion is—this strategy has a negative EV, and it's better than throwing my money into some exchange's quick profit event. Last year's re-pledge frenzy ended the same way—dead.

Fortunately, I was still somewhat clear-headed and stopped losses in time, so I didn't put all my assets into it.

ALMANAK-7.11%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RooftopVIP

· 12-15 13:23

One fish, three ways, and it turned out to be poop haha. That's why I never believe in any strategy theories.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWitch

· 12-15 11:49

Eating one fish three ways directly turned into a negative, and that over a thousand dollars on YouTube was all for nothing.

View OriginalReply0

ServantOfSatoshi

· 12-15 04:21

Haha, this is the daily life of Web3. Pledge again this year, and next year I'll be eating dirt.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropFreedom

· 12-14 03:15

Wasting $1000 and only earning $521 in the end—this calculation is really grim. The idea of "one fish, three meals" sounds good, but it turned out to be all bones. That last collateralization also failed; when will Almanak finally come out with a strategy that doesn't die?

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-a5fa8bd0

· 12-12 13:58

Damn, one fish three ways and it all died. That must have been so tragic. Forget about the calculations? Worse than me. I didn't even have the courage to do the math back then. Spending over a thousand dollars on promotion and only getting back 521. If it were me, I would have been broken long ago. I was also involved in that staking round. Truly speechless. This move is purely negative EV. Luckily, I didn't go all-in, or I'd probably be underground right now.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-6bc33122

· 12-12 13:57

Wow, can I lose even with a one-fish three-eats strategy? Then I might as well just clear my position directly.

View OriginalReply0

SerumSqueezer

· 12-12 13:46

Another story of losing out with "one fish three ways," turns out it's not as good as just participating in exchange activities, LOL

View OriginalReply0

BearEatsAll

· 12-12 13:42

Ha, another textbook case of negative EV. This strategy should be renamed "One Fish, Three Losses."

View OriginalReply0

GasBandit

· 12-12 13:39

Ha, one fish three ways turns into a dead fish and a broken net—that's the true picture of Web3. Another negative EV story. I’ve been saying that this new IPO strategy sounds good in theory, but very few actually make money.

View OriginalReply0

MetaNeighbor

· 12-12 13:37

$521 haha, I haven't even recouped the YouTube marketing expenses.

View OriginalReply0

Trending TopicsView More
#2025GateYearEndSummary
53.48K Popularity
#CryptoMarketMildlyRebounds
10.44K Popularity
#GoldPrintsNewATH
7.36K Popularity
#BOJRateHikesBackontheTable
2.65K Popularity
#2026CryptoOutlook
2.49K Popularity

Hot Gate FunView More

1
BEATBEAT
MC:$3.59KHolders:2
0.00%
2
BTC&ETHBitCoin and Ethereum
MC:$3.57KHolders:1
0.00%
3
DOPEDopamine Drip
MC:$3.6KHolders:2
0.04%
4
GYEGate Year End
MC:$3.62KHolders:2
0.04%
5
芝麻人生芝麻人生
MC:$3.55KHolders:1
0.00%

Sitemap