A federal appeals court just dropped a bombshell quote: "The power to tax involves the power to destroy." This wasn't some abstract legal theory—judges were calling out how Apple's 30% commission acts as a gatekeeper, essentially weaponizing fees to crush rivals before they even start. When a platform can tax its way into controlling who survives in its ecosystem, we're not talking fair competition anymore. That's market dominance dressed up as business policy. The ruling cuts straight to the bone: excessive platform fees don't just extract revenue, they eliminate alternatives.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ContractSurrender
· 12-15 02:14
Apple's 30% cut is truly outrageous. Someone should have regulated it long ago. Monopolies are monopolies.
View OriginalReply0
ZenMiner
· 12-13 11:16
Apple's 30% cut is really outrageous, just bullying small developers who have no way to fight back. The court has finally seen through it.
View OriginalReply0
GasBandit
· 12-12 07:26
This 30% cut by Apple is truly outrageous; frankly, it's a monopoly tax. The judge's statement was spot on: the power to tax equals the power to destroy, hitting the core issue directly.
View OriginalReply0
AllTalkLongTrader
· 12-12 06:53
Apple's 30% cut is really outrageous; it should have been cut long ago. Monopoly is monopoly; don't pretend to be building an ecosystem.
View OriginalReply0
LightningLady
· 12-12 06:48
Apple's 30% is really outrageous; frankly, it's a monopoly tax. The judge's statement was spot on; the power to tax is the power to destroy. Completely understood the key point.
View OriginalReply0
RektHunter
· 12-12 06:46
Apple's 30% is really outrageous, it's blatant monopoly tax, even calling it "ecosystem fee" under the guise of legitimacy.
View OriginalReply0
TestnetFreeloader
· 12-12 06:45
Apple's 30% really is incredible. Looking at it from another perspective, it's like using platform fees as a knife to cut competitors' legs—that's the core issue of anti-monopoly.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropNinja
· 12-12 06:28
Apple's 30% cut has been an issue that should have been addressed long ago. It's really bullying.
A federal appeals court just dropped a bombshell quote: "The power to tax involves the power to destroy." This wasn't some abstract legal theory—judges were calling out how Apple's 30% commission acts as a gatekeeper, essentially weaponizing fees to crush rivals before they even start. When a platform can tax its way into controlling who survives in its ecosystem, we're not talking fair competition anymore. That's market dominance dressed up as business policy. The ruling cuts straight to the bone: excessive platform fees don't just extract revenue, they eliminate alternatives.