Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
We don’t need another on-chain prediction market.
We need a better one.
Most new “decentralized prediction markets” are simply clones of Polymarket/Kalshi, offering less liquidity, reduced trust, and no genuine competitive edge.
Same regulatory grey zone.
Same binary markets.
Different logo.
Same topics.
Same UX.
If you’re not changing the structure of the game, you’re just fragmenting liquidity and making the entire sector weaker.
Polymarket owns the “permissionless, degen, real-world info” lane with deep liquidity on politics, macro, and culture. Kalshi owns the “regulated event exchange” lane with CFTC oversight and clean fiat rails.
For the average user who wants to bet on “Will X happen?” with real money and fast settlement, the job is already done.
→ The core issues today are not “we need more platforms”.
Liquidity is thin and fragmented on long-tail markets.
Regulation is a minefield, split by jurisdiction.
UX and trust still trade off between “fully on-chain but clunky” vs “smooth but custodial.”
A new app with the same mechanics doesn’t fix any of that. It just adds another ghost market with 3 traders and a 15% spread.
When a new market is worth building
New prediction markets only make sense if they:
→ Unlock a new vertical (e.g., DAO governance/futarchy, enterprise forecasting, specialized sectors).
→ Fix liquidity in a fundamental way (novel incentive design, cross-venue routing, market-making infra).
→ Solve a regulatory gap (clear licenses, compliant geos, transparent structure).
→ Radically improve UX & on-ramps (non-crypto native, mobile-first, simple mental model).
If you can’t explain in one sentence what you do differently from Polymarket/Kalshi/Augur—beyond “on another chain”, you’re not innovating, you’re diluting.
Prediction markets don’t need more platforms.
They need: deeper liquidity, clearer rules, better UX, and sharper use cases.
Until a new project tackles at least one of those head-on, launching “yet another prediction market” isn’t building the future.
It’s building noise.
Economad writes✍️