Assessing whether a public chain is reliable isn't just about looking at how high TPS can go. The real test is: Is the market structure solid enough? Can it remain stable during bull and bear transitions and extreme market conditions?



Currently, most chains face the problem that — the market is too "flat." Price, risk, liquidity—these are often only effective within certain time windows. When market volatility spikes or cycles extend slightly, the entire system starts to struggle, either experiencing liquidity depletion or price distortion. Assets no longer exhibit deep interconnections, let alone supporting complex financial product construction.

Injective is doing something a little different—it’s attempting to build a "multi-scale market structure." What does that mean? It means that whether you’re looking at second-level K-lines, hourly trends, or long-term cycles, this system can keep prices coherent, risks orderly dispersed, liquidity flowing reasonably, and execution stable and reliable.

How is this achieved? It can be broken down into several key points:

**Prices will not "break apart"**
Short-term prices are determined by the depth of the perpetual contract order book, medium-term trends are absorbed by index products, and long-term value is reflected in structured asset portfolios. These different temporal price signals are not isolated; they are anchored and calibrated against each other. As a result, the price system is less likely to tear or distort, providing a reliable reference for pricing complex derivatives.

**Risks are "layered and absorbed"**
Traditional on-chain protocols tend to collapse entirely when facing black swan events. Injective’s approach is to handle risks at different levels: short-term sharp fluctuations are borne by the perpetual contract market, medium-term risks are smoothed by index products, and longer cycles or tail extreme risks are further diluted through structural design.

This multi-layered approach essentially lays a foundation for serious financial applications. It’s not about flashy technology, but about market architecture inherently possessing resilience against complex scenarios.
INJ-3,03%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SnapshotDayLaborervip
· 2025-12-13 21:24
This logic sounds okay, but honestly, whether it can withstand when the market cracks is still a whole different story.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropATMvip
· 2025-12-12 18:31
Hey, this angle is fresh. Blowing TPS every day is indeed pointless; architecture is the real strength. Wait, can INJ's multi-scale approach really hold up? I'm still a bit skeptical... Diversifying risk at multiple layers sounds reliable, but I'm worried it might be just talk. This logic is indeed solid, much smarter than those chains that only focus on stacking computing power. If they can really achieve price continuity, that would be amazing. The key is whether it can withstand extreme market conditions. It's a nice statement, but the real test is still ahead—let's see in a bear market. Isn't this building a derivatives ecosystem on the chain? Sounds pretty ambitious.
View OriginalReply0
PumpingCroissantvip
· 2025-12-11 02:54
The idea of multi-scale market structure is indeed interesting, much more reliable than those chains that only boast TPS. --- In essence, it's about resilience against black swan events—that's the true moat. --- Wait, can Injective's layered risk digestion truly withstand it? Depends on real-world performance. --- I'm a bit skeptical about price anchoring; can the depth of perpetual contract order books truly stabilize and guide long-term asset portfolios? --- Another "multi-dimensional" argument—each seems to say the same, but in the end, it all comes down to who survives the longest. --- It's somewhat meaningful, but no matter how fantastic the market structure is, it can't escape the liquidity providers running away.
View OriginalReply0
FadCatchervip
· 2025-12-11 02:50
The idea of multi-scale market structure is indeed impressive. Finally, someone is focusing on system stability rather than just boosting TPS.
View OriginalReply0
ColdWalletAnxietyvip
· 2025-12-11 02:32
That TPS argument has long been dead, really. Market structure is the key, and I am optimistic about INJ's multi-scale approach.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)