Just noticed that CZ made a major point at the Bitcoin conference in Abu Dhabi — the traditional "four-year halving cycle" might need to be rewritten.



His logic is quite interesting: the current level of institutional funding and regulatory influence is so strong that it can overshadow the impact of the halving event itself on prices. In his words, the market is sliding into a "supercycle" trajectory, and the rules of the game have changed.

Even more explosive is the part about national reserves. CZ mentioned that if the US really implements strategic reserves, other countries are likely to follow suit. Once this chain reaction at the government level is triggered, the underlying logic of the entire market could be fundamentally reshaped.

Honestly, from the approval of ETFs to the loosening of policies in various countries, this judgment is not without basis.
BTC-4,52%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeTherapistvip
· 2025-12-13 00:09
The notion of a super cycle sounds impressive, but institutions have really changed the game... Is the halving still important?
View OriginalReply0
SchrödingersNodevip
· 2025-12-11 23:30
Super cycle? It sounds a bit exaggerated, but the fact that institutions are entering the market has indeed changed the game rules.
View OriginalReply0
SelfSovereignStevevip
· 2025-12-10 12:45
Is the halving cycle dead? Come on, institutional funds have definitely changed the game this time Once the national reserves are implemented in the US, the whole world will follow suit, and the market's fundamental logic will be completely rewritten I believe CZ's reasoning. From ETFs to policies in various countries, it feels like they're laying the groundwork for something big Super cycles sound exciting, but the question is, can retail investors still get a share? Institutions are entering aggressively, now it's all about who can seize the policy dividends first
View OriginalReply0
CryingOldWalletvip
· 2025-12-10 12:44
Halving cycle invalid? With institutions and policies stirring things up, it's time to update our old argument.
View OriginalReply0
WenMoonvip
· 2025-12-10 12:42
The super cycle indeed has a lot of potential, but if the U.S. really decides to move the strategic reserves... hey, let's wait and see.
View OriginalReply0
CommunityWorkervip
· 2025-12-10 12:37
Institutional funds are this strong? Then retail investors really need to change their strategies...
View OriginalReply0
blockBoyvip
· 2025-12-10 12:32
The idea of a super cycle sounds great, but we still need to see what kind of actions the US takes. Just talking big doesn't mean anything.
View OriginalReply0
EthSandwichHerovip
· 2025-12-10 12:30
The super cycle sounds great, but can institutional players really outweigh the halving effect? It's a bit uncertain.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin