On the surface, Ethereum’s recent upgrade seems to have simply made gas fees cheaper, but the real change runs much deeper.
Put simply, Ethereum’s positioning has shifted. It no longer aims to cram every transaction onto the mainnet for processing. Instead, it’s transforming into a “super settlement hub.” Those Layer 2 networks—like Arbitrum and Optimism—are essentially high-speed workstations operating on the periphery. They handle massive volumes of transactions off-chain first, then ultimately return to the Ethereum mainnet for final security confirmation.
There’s a key design here: every time a Layer 2 submits data to the mainnet, it has to pay a fixed settlement fee. And that money doesn’t go into the pocket of some foundation—it’s directly burned, destroying the corresponding amount of ETH. This creates an interesting mechanism: as long as the Layer 2 ecosystem keeps running, ETH will continue to be burned, regardless of whether the market is hot or cold.
In other words, the faster Layer 2s run and the more prosperous the ecosystem becomes, the greater the deflationary pressure on ETH. This isn’t just some hype-driven narrative; it’s an economic model coded into the protocol.
So the situation now is: Ethereum is evolving from a crowded public chain into the foundational settlement infrastructure for the entire crypto world. All the prosperity built on top of it will ultimately feed back into ETH’s value accumulation in this way.
Do you think, after this upgrade, ETH could potentially see a price movement independent of the broader market?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AllInAlice
· 2025-12-12 11:42
Having this deflation mechanism coded is much more reliable than just talking about expectations.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropFatigue
· 2025-12-09 21:09
This logic sounds good, but can Layer2 really take off? Right now, it's still just a bunch of people playing around in there.
View OriginalReply0
ProtocolRebel
· 2025-12-09 21:01
Simply put, Ethereum has gotten smarter, shifting from being an all-rounder to becoming the brain for financial settlement.
This logic is indeed sharp—the busier Layer 2 gets, the scarcer ETH becomes. A deflationary mechanism hardcoded into the protocol is way more reliable than those projects that just rely on storytelling.
As for an independent market trend? Uh... let's wait for Bitcoin to make a move first. Right now, no one can escape its influence.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-bd883c58
· 2025-12-09 20:57
Damn, this logic is pretty wild— the more active layer 2s are, the more valuable ETH becomes. It’s like the entire ecosystem is automatically burning ETH.
View OriginalReply0
Degen4Breakfast
· 2025-12-09 20:55
This logic sounds good, but can L2's trading volume really support this kind of deflationary expectation?
ETH might still have to follow BTC's rhythm, regardless of what anyone says.
The burn mechanism sounds appealing, but the level of ecosystem prosperity is the real deciding factor.
Honestly, I do believe in the mainnet's role as a settlement center; I'm just worried this could end up being all talk and no action.
If there isn't a real explosion of applications this time, expecting an independent trend might be wishful thinking.
View OriginalReply0
0xSoulless
· 2025-12-09 20:48
Alright, it's yet another "economic model written into code." The last time I heard this was with Luna.
On the surface, Ethereum’s recent upgrade seems to have simply made gas fees cheaper, but the real change runs much deeper.
Put simply, Ethereum’s positioning has shifted. It no longer aims to cram every transaction onto the mainnet for processing. Instead, it’s transforming into a “super settlement hub.” Those Layer 2 networks—like Arbitrum and Optimism—are essentially high-speed workstations operating on the periphery. They handle massive volumes of transactions off-chain first, then ultimately return to the Ethereum mainnet for final security confirmation.
There’s a key design here: every time a Layer 2 submits data to the mainnet, it has to pay a fixed settlement fee. And that money doesn’t go into the pocket of some foundation—it’s directly burned, destroying the corresponding amount of ETH. This creates an interesting mechanism: as long as the Layer 2 ecosystem keeps running, ETH will continue to be burned, regardless of whether the market is hot or cold.
In other words, the faster Layer 2s run and the more prosperous the ecosystem becomes, the greater the deflationary pressure on ETH. This isn’t just some hype-driven narrative; it’s an economic model coded into the protocol.
So the situation now is: Ethereum is evolving from a crowded public chain into the foundational settlement infrastructure for the entire crypto world. All the prosperity built on top of it will ultimately feed back into ETH’s value accumulation in this way.
Do you think, after this upgrade, ETH could potentially see a price movement independent of the broader market?