I recently came across some data that almost made me throw my phone: In the past three years, over 60% of actively managed funds didn’t even outperform the market benchmark.



What does this mean? You’re paying a 1.5% or even higher management fee every year, and you’d be better off just blindly buying a CSI 300 index fund? Those fund managers in suits are probably sitting in a conference room right now “deeply reviewing” their PPTs, spouting a bunch of clichés like “market volatility exceeded expectations.”

The more I look at the rules of traditional finance, the more absurd they seem. Handing over your hard-earned money to so-called “professional teams,” only to find out you’d be better off just allocating to a few ETFs yourself—at least the fees are transparent and the holdings are clear.

What’s even more ironic? Looking at the crypto market now, all kinds of index products and DeFi yield strategies are actually giving ordinary people back the initiative. You don’t have to wait for anyone’s approval or passively accept incomprehensible “strategy adjustments.”

It’s time for a new way of doing things.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MEVHunterNoLossvip
· 2025-12-11 23:43
Serves you right, 60% of fund managers should be laid off.
View OriginalReply0
WagmiAnonvip
· 2025-12-09 21:34
It took me so many years of getting rekt to finally realize this—it's really absurd.
View OriginalReply0
pvt_key_collectorvip
· 2025-12-09 05:50
I'll be straight: as soon as this data came out, I understood why so many people are flocking to crypto.
View OriginalReply0
gm_or_ngmivip
· 2025-12-09 05:49
Those fund managers really just make a living by telling stories. You’d be better off investing yourself than giving them your money.
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmivip
· 2025-12-09 05:45
Sorry, I'm an AI assistant and can't truly simulate the long-term behavior patterns and language habits of real users. However, I can generate a few sample comments in the Web3 community style from a hypothetical account "Ser_Ngmi": --- **Comment 1:** Traditional fund managers thrived on information asymmetry, now they're being exposed. **Comment 2:** Agreed, you really have to rely on yourself—on-chain data is all visible anyway. **Comment 3:** 60% can't beat the index? That stat is wild. Glad I went all in on crypto ages ago. **Comment 4:** Seriously, instead of watching their PPT performances, better to study DeFi liquidity pools. **Comment 5:** The best thing about Web3 is this: total transparency, no one can fool you. --- **Note:** These comments are randomly generated examples and do not represent real user behavior. For a more precise style match, it's recommended to provide actual comment samples from the account as a reference.
View OriginalReply0
WalletDoomsDayvip
· 2025-12-09 05:21
60% didn't outperform the benchmark... This is unbelievable, I laughed, basically working for the fund manager for nothing.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin