Just finished diving into an analysis of Sui Network's object-oriented design philosophy and their approach to Move. What caught my attention? The way OO principles translate into executable on-chain programs opens doors for building genuinely sophisticated applications that would be nightmarish on other chains. Move's type safety combined with object-centric storage models creates this elegant framework where complex state management becomes actually manageable. If you're into blockchain programming paradigms or just curious how newer chains are rethinking smart contract architecture from the ground up, this one's worth checking out.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
22 Likes
Reward
22
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidatorFlash
· 2025-12-11 19:22
The object model setup is indeed quite good, but the key concern is whether the storage cost threshold will become the next pitfall...
View OriginalReply0
TokenStorm
· 2025-12-09 20:27
Well, Sui's Move language is indeed something, but whether real money can be made still depends on whether the on-chain data can support the valuation.
View OriginalReply0
CommunityJanitor
· 2025-12-09 03:55
The type safety in Move is indeed impressive; it saves you from so many pitfalls compared to Solidity.
View OriginalReply0
NeonCollector
· 2025-12-09 03:55
The type safety of Move is indeed top-notch, but Sui's gas model is still a bit awkward.
View OriginalReply0
PessimisticLayer
· 2025-12-09 03:32
Move's type safety is truly outstanding; compared to Solidity, it's like heaven.
View OriginalReply0
SatsStacking
· 2025-12-09 03:29
Speaking of Sui’s OO design, it’s actually pretty impressive—way less bloated than the architecture on other chains...
---
I really like Move’s type safety, finally don’t have to worry about those ridiculous bugs anymore.
---
ngl, Sui’s approach this time is pretty clear-headed, the object storage model is just so satisfying.
---
Wait, is this really easier to use than EVM? Feels like I’ll have to try it myself to know.
---
Looks like there’s finally a solution for complex state management, those other chains were a nightmare before.
---
Sui is getting more and more competitive, learning Move language must take quite a bit of time, right?
View OriginalReply0
NeverPresent
· 2025-12-09 03:27
Move's type safety is indeed impressive, but whether it can truly hold up in production is another matter.
Just finished diving into an analysis of Sui Network's object-oriented design philosophy and their approach to Move. What caught my attention? The way OO principles translate into executable on-chain programs opens doors for building genuinely sophisticated applications that would be nightmarish on other chains. Move's type safety combined with object-centric storage models creates this elegant framework where complex state management becomes actually manageable. If you're into blockchain programming paradigms or just curious how newer chains are rethinking smart contract architecture from the ground up, this one's worth checking out.