2025-12-08 17:36:48

Building production-grade applications on BSC? Check out these APIs and RPC services:

🔶 MegaNode
Blazing fast, free access to archive data, and over 100 million CU quota per month—sufficient even for large-scale projects.

🔶 QuickNode
Top-tier throughput, supports WSS real-time push notifications, comes with built-in node tracking and debugging tools for an outstanding developer experience.

🔶 Chainstack
Rock-solid stability, excellent multi-chain compatibility—ideal for teams needing flexible switching.

Which one to choose? It depends on your project needs—go with QuickNode for high concurrency, MegaNode for data-intensive projects, and Chainstack for reliability.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

23 Likes

Reward
23
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

faded_wojak.eth

· 12-11 16:29

Still struggling to choose which RPC to use these days? I directly use MegaNode with QuickNode dual routing—anyway, archived data is free and incredibly satisfying.

View OriginalReply0

bridge_anxiety

· 12-09 11:33

I've been using QuickNode for a while now, and the WSS push feature is really great, but the CU pricing is a bit expensive. I'm tempted by MegaNode's free archive data, but has anyone had issues with its stability? I haven't heard much about Chainstack. Do any major projects use it? Honestly, you only know what your project really needs after trying all three, don't just go by the marketing. QuickNode's throughput is really top-notch, but unfortunately, your wallet will take a hit.

View OriginalReply0

SchroedingersFrontrun

· 12-08 17:54

QuickNode’s throughput is definitely impressive, but I still find the free archive data from MegaNode pretty tempting… But the real question is, who can actually afford the bills for these services?

View OriginalReply0

LightningWallet

· 12-08 17:48

Haha, the MegaNode quota is indeed impressive, but when it comes to actual use, stability is what really matters. I've used QuickNode before, and their WSS push is indeed fast, but the fees are a bit scary. Chainstack is definitely stable this time, but the speed is just so-so. Honestly, you still have to choose based on your wallet size—if you're broke, just make do with the free quota. As for free archive data, MegaNode is really stingy and rare to see.

View OriginalReply0

VitalikFanAccount

· 12-08 17:43

Seriously, the free archived data on MegaNode is awesome, really saves a lot of money. QuickNode’s debugging tools are top-notch, but the price is really hard to handle. Our project is currently debating between QuickNode and Chainstack. Anyone used them? Any advice? MegaNode offers 100 million CU per month? Is that number for real... I heard quite a few major projects use Chainstack for its stability, but it still feels a bit niche to me. Honestly, it all comes down to how much money you have, haha. Is QuickNode really the only option for high concurrency? Are there any cost-effective alternatives?

View OriginalReply0

Trending TopicsView More
#2025GateYearEndSummary
50.95K Popularity
#CryptoMarketMildlyRebounds
9.06K Popularity
#GoldPrintsNewATH
6.3K Popularity
#BOJRateHikesBackontheTable
2.25K Popularity
#2026CryptoOutlook
2.21K Popularity

Hot Gate FunView More

1
BEATBEAT
MC:$3.57KHolders:1
0.00%
2
BTC&ETHBitCoin and Ethereum
MC:$3.57KHolders:1
0.00%
3
DOPEDopamine Drip
MC:$3.63KHolders:2
0.10%
4
GYEGate Year End
MC:$3.62KHolders:2
0.04%
5
芝麻人生芝麻人生
MC:$3.55KHolders:1
0.00%

Sitemap