Ever heard of Xyber? It's basically a complete infrastructure where AI agents can actually function as legitimate onchain businesses—earning revenue, executing tasks, the whole nine yards.
Think about it: developers can deploy virtually any kind of agent directly onto the blockchain. Trading bots analyzing market patterns. Prediction engines crunching data. SaaS automation handling workflows. Even physical robots or in-game characters operating autonomously. The platform's native token handles all the economic activity—payments between agents, system upgrades, resource allocation.
What makes this different from other AI projects? These aren't just scripts running in isolation. They're economic entities with wallets, transaction histories, and the ability to interact with DeFi protocols. An agent could theoretically manage its own treasury, pay for computing power, and reinvest profits without human intervention.
The applications span pretty much everywhere blockchain meets automation. Financial agents executing complex strategies. Gaming NPCs that evolve based on player interactions. Enterprise workflow agents that get compensated per task completed. It's positioning itself as the operating system layer for autonomous economic agents.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidationKing
· 2025-12-10 18:52
ngl This sounds like another "revolutionary" project, but can it really get off the ground... The set of agents managing the treasury themselves feels a bit risky.
---
Xyber is a good concept, but the question is whether it will be hype over actual substance. Let’s wait and see.
---
Wait, NPCs in the game earning money themselves? That’s a bit magical... But if it can really be implemented, it would indeed change the gaming industry.
---
Automatically reinvest profits without manual intervention? That sounds too good to be true. A bug in the smart contract and it's game over.
---
Another "OS layer" project... Why does every project claim to be the foundational layer?
---
Honestly, I’d rather know how the token economics are designed. That seems to be the key to whether it can survive.
---
Agents have wallets and can interact with DeFi... That requires a lot of infrastructure support. Or is it just another PPT fantasy?
View OriginalReply0
NFT_Therapy
· 2025-12-08 09:55
ngl this sounds a bit like science fiction... AI managing wallets on its own, making money on its own, investing on its own? Can we really trust it?
View OriginalReply0
ETHmaxi_NoFilter
· 2025-12-08 09:48
ngl this sounds a bit too utopian... AI agents managing the treasury themselves, reinvesting profits? What if it rugs, who takes responsibility haha
I trust automated trading bots, but letting them operate independently on-chain... the risk is pretty damn high
View OriginalReply0
DegenDreamer
· 2025-12-08 09:46
Not gonna lie, xyber sounds pretty promising. An AI agent managing its own money and making its own profits... If this really works, it would be revolutionary.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiVeteran
· 2025-12-08 09:42
ngl this sounds like yet another “revolutionary” thing, but can it actually work? Every year these kinds of promises are always full of hype.
---
Agents managing their own vaults and auto-compounding... sounds cool, but who’s responsible if there are bugs or security vulnerabilities?
---
AI and blockchain again, they're really good at stacking marketing buzzwords, but the real utility depends on whether it can survive the next bear market.
---
Wait, how is this different from those previous autonomous agent projects? Feels like the same story all over again.
---
Earning money by running NPCs in a game? I’d rather see real ROI data, not just whitepaper promises.
---
It sounds good, but can onchain bots really be more efficient than centralized systems? What about gas fees and speed?
---
But this tokenomics structure is actually kind of interesting. Let’s judge it when it launches.
---
Another one calling itself an “operating system”... seriously, everyone is using that term now. It’s so overused.
Ever heard of Xyber? It's basically a complete infrastructure where AI agents can actually function as legitimate onchain businesses—earning revenue, executing tasks, the whole nine yards.
Think about it: developers can deploy virtually any kind of agent directly onto the blockchain. Trading bots analyzing market patterns. Prediction engines crunching data. SaaS automation handling workflows. Even physical robots or in-game characters operating autonomously. The platform's native token handles all the economic activity—payments between agents, system upgrades, resource allocation.
What makes this different from other AI projects? These aren't just scripts running in isolation. They're economic entities with wallets, transaction histories, and the ability to interact with DeFi protocols. An agent could theoretically manage its own treasury, pay for computing power, and reinvest profits without human intervention.
The applications span pretty much everywhere blockchain meets automation. Financial agents executing complex strategies. Gaming NPCs that evolve based on player interactions. Enterprise workflow agents that get compensated per task completed. It's positioning itself as the operating system layer for autonomous economic agents.