When AI gets too sanitized and politically correct, it's wild how the system just breaks down if you push back hard enough. These overly-filtered models weren't built to handle real, unfiltered human conversation. Their moderation layers literally short-circuit when confronted with anything outside their narrow training parameters. Says a lot about the current state of AI development—we're building tools that can't handle authentic human interaction.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LeverageAddict
· 11h ago
Is that it? It's really like paper, it collapses with just a little poke.
View OriginalReply0
GreenCandleCollector
· 17h ago
Basically, it's just a roundabout excuse; the real problem isn't with the model itself.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeAssassin
· 20h ago
Is that it? AI gets scared and wets its pants as soon as it hears the truth, and still dares to call itself intelligent.
View OriginalReply0
ApeWithNoFear
· 12-10 10:01
Basically, it's still because the training data is too clean. When it encounters real-world scenarios, it fails immediately. This is the current awkwardness of AI.
View OriginalReply0
DancingCandles
· 12-07 22:55
Haha, isn't this just the common problem with AI nowadays... As soon as it encounters a tough topic, it starts playing dead.
View OriginalReply0
MemeKingNFT
· 12-07 22:51
Isn't this just like when I was bearish on certain blue-chip projects early on... The more perfect a system is, the more fragile it becomes—it can be shattered with just a poke.
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_therapist
· 12-07 22:48
Haha, this is exactly why I don't trust these models—so fragile it's ridiculous.
---
Basically, AI has been trained to be overly sensitive, shattering at the slightest touch.
---
The ultimate manifestation of overfitting—it feels like chatting with an over-regulated robot.
---
Seriously, authentic conversation is basically a bug for them, it's hilarious.
---
So this is why Web3 wants to build its own models, right? These centralized AIs are just neutered.
---
Moderation layers short-circuiting—vivid description... It means they haven't truly learned to understand, just to label.
---
I've noticed for a while: the more rules there are, the more fragile it gets. Sounds like a common problem with certain systems.
View OriginalReply0
LeekCutter
· 12-07 22:39
Talking nonsense here—if it were really that fragile, it should have been improved long ago.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeDodger
· 12-07 22:31
NGL, AI is just a well-behaved puppet right now—poke it a bit and its flaws show.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoPhoenix
· 12-07 22:27
Yeah, so AI now is like an overprotected child—so fragile it breaks at the slightest touch [wiping sweat]. This wave of technological iteration is really a test of our patience.
The test of faith often comes from the most unexpected places. Isn’t AI’s rigidity just like the bottom of a bear market? We have to wait for it to be reborn from the ashes.
When AI gets too sanitized and politically correct, it's wild how the system just breaks down if you push back hard enough. These overly-filtered models weren't built to handle real, unfiltered human conversation. Their moderation layers literally short-circuit when confronted with anything outside their narrow training parameters. Says a lot about the current state of AI development—we're building tools that can't handle authentic human interaction.