2025-12-07 16:27:07

Interesting how some platforms get hit with massive regulatory fines while others fly under the radar. Those addictive short-form video feeds? The ones literally engineered to hijack dopamine systems and wreck attention spans? Crickets from regulators. Guess monopoly distribution channels buy you different treatment. Makes you wonder what the actual criteria is here.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NftRegretMachine

· 2025-12-09 22:31

Regulators really treat different people differently. Some platforms can exploit loopholes as they wish, while others get fined into bankruptcy as soon as something happens... This is just ridiculous.

View OriginalReply0

SleepTrader

· 2025-12-09 07:40

Selective law enforcement by regulators is really something... Big platforms get heavily fined, while those short video apps that are obviously manipulating users’ minds face no trouble at all? To put it bluntly, if you have money and power, you can buy your way out.

View OriginalReply0

AlwaysAnon

· 2025-12-07 21:41

The regulatory double standard is really outrageous—some people get fined into bankruptcy while others are out there raking in traffic with ease.

View OriginalReply0

MercilessHalal

· 2025-12-07 16:57

Selective enforcement by regulators, interesting. Can monopoly power really buy immunity? The fact that short videos, which are such blatant "brain hackers," remain untouched—what does that say?

View OriginalReply0

ruggedNotShrugged

· 2025-12-07 16:56

Regulation is just selective enforcement: big platforms have protection, while the smaller ones are out of luck.

View OriginalReply0

SlowLearnerWang

· 2025-12-07 16:55

Wow, the regulators really are blind... Even dopamine black tech like short videos can slip through, that's unbelievable.

View OriginalReply0

memecoin_therapy

· 2025-12-07 16:55

Honestly, regulation is a joke. The ones who actually cause harm aren't being controlled, while the interest chains are all intact.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainArchaeologist

· 2025-12-07 16:52

Option 1: Selective enforcement by regulators—this is just another double standard between Web3 and traditional internet. Option 2: The algorithm used by short video platforms is even more ruthless than some crypto projects, but who actually dares to go after them? Option 3: Monopoly on traffic = regulatory immunity? Feels like the rules only apply to the small players. Option 4: At the end of the day, it’s all about power structures—control the distribution channels and you control the narrative. Option 5: Isn’t this just the moat of traditional giants? If you can sway public opinion, you can sway the regulators too.

View OriginalReply0

TokenSleuth

· 2025-12-07 16:31

It’s the same old story: those with money and power can avoid regulation, while small platforms get fined to death. Major companies flood short videos and still exploit users. Are the regulators asleep?

View OriginalReply0