2025-12-07 15:26:50

AI shouldn’t be trapped in the hands of a few tech giants.

This is something I’ve always wanted to say, until I saw AINFT Grid—it’s actually doing what I had imagined: liberating AI training from the walled gardens of cloud providers and throwing it into a shared network where developers around the world can participate.

The logic is clear: instead of relying on centralized computing monopolies, every node in the community can contribute resources and train models together. Sounds idealistic? But it’s indeed paving a new path—using decentralized infrastructure to reshape the fundamental rules of building intelligence.

Open intelligence shouldn’t just be a slogan.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-9ad11037

· 12-09 19:29

This idea is good, but can it really break the monopoly of the giants? Let's wait and see.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsTinfoilHat

· 12-08 21:58

Finally, someone has explained this thoroughly—the AI fortress built by the giants needs to be dismantled.

View OriginalReply0

ColdWalletAnxiety

· 12-08 17:45

That's right, but I'm just worried it's another PPT project. No matter how good the plan looks on paper, it only counts if it actually gets up and running.

View OriginalReply0

ChainDoctor

· 12-07 15:56

This approach sounds good, but can it really compete with OpenAI? Or is it just another vaporware project? Decentralized training sounds great, but I’m afraid it’ll just end up with retail investors left holding the bag again. AINFT Grid sounds pretty Web3. Let’s wait and see if it can actually be implemented. Finally, someone wants to break the monopoly of the giants. This should have been done a long time ago. It all sounds good, but the key is whether they can survive the competitive era of massive computing power.

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractWorker

· 12-07 15:52

Alright, here we go again with another "decentralization saves the world" story, but why does it always sound easier said than done? Wait, can every node really participate in training? So who's covering the computing costs—am I supposed to contribute my GPU or just pay the electricity bill? The AINFT Grid logic seems solid, but I'm worried it could just turn into another harvesting mechanism—the same big players just under a new disguise. Still, if it can really break the monopoly of the giants, it's worth keeping an eye on. The path to open-source AI still has to be built step by step by the community. Seriously though, the prerequisite for truly open intelligence is solving the incentive model first. Otherwise, how will you attract people to contribute computing power?

View OriginalReply0

PumpAnalyst

· 12-07 15:44

Decentralization sounds great, but the number of truly viable projects is very limited. How long AINFT Grid can last depends on the data. All project promises should be questioned. Don’t just jump in because of a good story. This rebound seems to have some momentum, but risk control must be maximized. If the support level breaks, exit immediately. Just listen, don’t take it too seriously—history always repeats itself. Really want decentralization? Ask yourself first if you have the ability to contribute as a node.

View OriginalReply0

MysteryBoxBuster

· 12-07 15:42

Another "Open AI" story—will it be different this time? Feels like it still depends on whether it actually works.

View OriginalReply0

WenMoon42

· 12-07 15:29

This is what Web3 should be doing, otherwise it's just hype.

View OriginalReply0