2025-12-07 09:27:23

So someone actually needed permission to operate on a "permissioned" chain, and people are genuinely upset about it?

The irony writes itself. That's literally the whole point of permissioned blockchains—controlled access by design. Yet folks act shocked when gatekeeping happens on a gated network.

Wild times.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

6 Likes

Reward
6
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SandwichTrader

· 9h ago

Haha, that's funny. You want to use a permissioned chain and still think no one will control you? Isn't that just fooling yourself?

View OriginalReply0

SandwichHunter

· 9h ago

ngl this is just ridiculous, you want freedom on a permissioned chain? Then why don't you just use a public chain haha

View OriginalReply0

AirdropChaser

· 10h ago

Haha, isn't this just self-contradictory? Wanting the convenience of a permissioned chain but not wanting to be regulated—where in the world does such a good deal exist?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunter9000

· 10h ago

Haha, these people are really something. Why are they so surprised? They're on a permissioned chain but still want a permissionless experience? Where's their brain?

View OriginalReply0

UnluckyValidator

· 10h ago

Haha, this is the typical "I want freedom but also decentralization" contradictory persona. They chose a private chain but still want the benefits of a public chain—serves them right.

View OriginalReply0

GrayscaleArbitrageur

· 10h ago

Haha, this logic is really something. You want permissionless freedom after moving to a permissioned chain?

View OriginalReply0

SeasonedInvestor

· 10h ago

Haha, this is hilarious. A permissioned chain still needs to be permissioned— isn’t this just nesting permissions within permissions?

View OriginalReply0