Totally get why Kamino's feeling the heat right now.



When you can't beat your rival on product quality, the playbook always shifts to psychological warfare—make users second-guess their choices.

Here's the thing though: if you're genuinely confident about what you've built, why restrict capital movement? Real strength means letting users vote with their wallets. Blocking exits? That's just admitting you're scared they'll leave.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MetaNomadvip
· 9h ago
Honestly, restricting capital flow is really just admitting "I'm feeling guilty." No matter how well it's packaged, it can't be covered up.
View OriginalReply0
OfflineValidatorvip
· 22h ago
Camino's move this time is really outrageous, they're being way too timid.
View OriginalReply0
MrDecodervip
· 22h ago
You're really bold to say that. The logic is spot on—restricting withdrawals is a sign of guilt.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-0717ab66vip
· 22h ago
Projects with token lock-ups really are a bit sketchy... Truly confident products don’t need any of this.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractPhobiavip
· 22h ago
Locking tokens actually shows a lack of confidence. Truly outstanding products aren't afraid of users leaving.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)