Sixteen years. That's how long Bitcoin has weathered bans, bear cycles, and a slow march toward mainstream adoption.



Tulip mania? Barely three years before it collapsed.

One built the rails for a parallel financial system. The other was just expensive flowers.

Anyone still comparing the two needs a history lesson.
BTC-0.04%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 2
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ForkThisDAOvip
· 6h ago
16 years vs 3 years, that's a huge difference. Those who understand history will get it.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWizardvip
· 6h ago
statistically speaking, the tulip comparison has like a 0.3% survival rate in serious convos anymore. given the historical data, anyone still trotting that out is basically admitting they haven't looked at actual correlation metrics between speculative assets and functional infrastructure... but go off i guess
Reply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)