A $100 trillion on-chain shift isn't fantasy anymore—it's becoming the actual playbook.
What's driving this? Infrastructure that can handle real-world bank liquidity while staying compliant at institutional scale. We're talking quantum-resistant privacy through protocols like Enygma, plus built-in AML/KYC automation that doesn't slow things down.
This hybrid setup might be what finally bridges traditional finance with decentralized rails. Not the flashy stuff—just the plumbing that works when billions are moving.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ForkInTheRoad
· 10h ago
100 trillion on-chain? This time it doesn't feel like just bragging.
View OriginalReply0
MintMaster
· 10h ago
The infrastructure capable of handling this scale is what truly holds value.
View OriginalReply0
RektButAlive
· 10h ago
It sounds like hype, but maybe this time it really is different?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeTherapist
· 10h ago
Wake up, the story of 100 trillion is told every year, but when it comes to actually getting on-chain, it all depends on whether the infrastructure is reliable or not.
A $100 trillion on-chain shift isn't fantasy anymore—it's becoming the actual playbook.
What's driving this? Infrastructure that can handle real-world bank liquidity while staying compliant at institutional scale. We're talking quantum-resistant privacy through protocols like Enygma, plus built-in AML/KYC automation that doesn't slow things down.
This hybrid setup might be what finally bridges traditional finance with decentralized rails. Not the flashy stuff—just the plumbing that works when billions are moving.