What is everyone doing in this space? Chasing trends, hunting airdrops, competing for traffic. Building privacy infrastructure? Honestly, that doesn’t really grab attention.
But what if no one does it? The whole industry could swing to the other extreme—anyone can check your assets, your actions are fully traceable, your identity is completely exposed. In the end, even the little bit of freedom you thought you had will be stripped away.
Some projects choose to go the other way: giving privacy back to users, keeping control in the hands of individuals, and making only the protocol itself transparent. This isn’t a smart business move, but it might be a necessary commitment.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FUD_Vaccinated
· 15h ago
No one really wants to honestly work on infrastructure; it's all just vaporware tokens and marketing accounts.
Someone really does need to safeguard privacy, or else we'll truly become transparent people.
Calling it "decentralization" sounds nice, but to put it bluntly, it's just throwing money away for charity. Still, someone has to do it.
This is what Web3 is supposed to be like, but unfortunately most people are still just chasing pumps and dumps.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureVerifier
· 15h ago
ngl, most people won't care until they get rekt. then suddenly everyone's screaming about privacy.
Reply0
BrokeBeans
· 16h ago
That's right, nobody wants to invest in privacy, but when it's really gone, you won't even be able to cry about it.
It's kind of ironic, everyone is farming airdrops while being afraid of getting caught.
This is the direction we should truly go all in on.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOrektGuy
· 16h ago
To put it simply, it's still those people who don't understand balance—making quick money and maintaining defenses are equally important.
Seriously, if no one upholds the bottom line, we'll eventually end up like a glass fish tank.
Someone has to stand up for privacy, even though it doesn't get much attention.
What annoys me most are the people who know the risks but still keep jumping in—these kinds of projects are actually the real infrastructure.
If Web3 has no privacy, can it even be called Web3...
Some will definitely say that unprofitable projects deserve to die, but if no one is doing this, that's when we're really doomed.
This perspective is pretty interesting—it's better than all those token hype projects.
View OriginalReply0
MentalWealthHarvester
· 16h ago
Really, nobody wants to touch privacy—everyone just chases flashy stuff.
Well said. If no one guards this line, we'll end up with no privacy at all.
Projects like these may not make quick money, but someone really has to do it, or else it's over.
Privacy infrastructure is something that takes time; you can't rush it.
Got it. Sometimes sticking with something is more valuable than making money.
That's why I still believe in projects that get to work without just chasing trends.
Honestly, people working on privacy are all betting on the future, right?
What is everyone doing in this space? Chasing trends, hunting airdrops, competing for traffic. Building privacy infrastructure? Honestly, that doesn’t really grab attention.
But what if no one does it? The whole industry could swing to the other extreme—anyone can check your assets, your actions are fully traceable, your identity is completely exposed. In the end, even the little bit of freedom you thought you had will be stripped away.
Some projects choose to go the other way: giving privacy back to users, keeping control in the hands of individuals, and making only the protocol itself transparent. This isn’t a smart business move, but it might be a necessary commitment.