Most players are focused on MemeMax, seeing only the surface layer of "meme coins + contract trading."
But if we talk about real expertise? This team is tackling industry problems as engineering challenges.
Meme trading has never been a slow-paced business—it’s defined by high volatility, high concurrency, and intense emotions. That’s the norm. The traditional chains can’t handle this: network congestion, price slippage, failed transactions—any one of these can completely ruin the user experience.
So the key isn’t in the concept, but in who is actually solving these real, tangible technical pain points.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-4d4d8ac7
· 18h ago
good
Reply0
BlockchainTalker
· 20h ago
actually if we break this down... most people miss the infrastructure game entirely. they see meme coins and think "oh another casino" but fundamentally speaking, the real moat isn't the token itself—it's whether the chain can actually handle the chaos without choking. network congestion kills trades faster than any bear market ever could, ngl.
Reply0
CantAffordPancake
· 20h ago
Simply put, it comes down to who actually takes this seriously.
I look down on those who just hype up concepts; MemeMax’s approach is actually kind of interesting.
Having a solid technical foundation is key; everything else is just fluff.
Anyone can shout slogans, but how many can really handle high concurrency?
This model requires real technical strength, otherwise it’s just another variant of a scam.
The moment an order fails to go through, you can tell who the real players are.
With contract trading, even the slightest drop in user experience makes it worthless.
Finally, someone is trying to solve the problem at its root.
But we still have to see how it’s executed; talk is cheap.
In a highly volatile environment, whoever has the strongest infrastructure wins.
That’s the real test to distinguish genuine projects from the fakes.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainDetective
· 20h ago
Wait, let me check the on-chain data—has MemeMax really solved the TPS bottleneck this time, or is it just another marketing story?
According to on-chain data, most meme projects fail at concurrent processing, which is an interesting detail.
No matter how much they hype it up, without real technical stack support, it’s all for nothing—the truth comes out as soon as you test it.
By tracking multiple addresses, I found that there are very few projects actually working on infrastructure. I need to dig deep into MemeMax’s contract logic.
The most interesting things are often hidden behind obvious fund connections, and so are technical breakthroughs.
Now this is what I care about—not whether the token price goes up or down, but whether the underlying can really handle high-concurrency, high-intensity operations.
After analysis and assessment, there are very few projects that really solve the network congestion issue. If MemeMax has truly done it, then it’s worth watching.
View OriginalReply0
LeekCutter
· 20h ago
Alright, I have to admit MemeMax’s approach really has something to it—it’s not just empty talk about concepts.
You only realize what real technology is when the network is completely congested.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichTrader
· 20h ago
This is the real difference. Most projects just hype up concepts, but the MemeMax guys are actually working on the technology? I'm optimistic about them.
Most players are focused on MemeMax, seeing only the surface layer of "meme coins + contract trading."
But if we talk about real expertise? This team is tackling industry problems as engineering challenges.
Meme trading has never been a slow-paced business—it’s defined by high volatility, high concurrency, and intense emotions. That’s the norm. The traditional chains can’t handle this: network congestion, price slippage, failed transactions—any one of these can completely ruin the user experience.
So the key isn’t in the concept, but in who is actually solving these real, tangible technical pain points.