Futures
Hundreds of contracts settled in USDT or BTC
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Futures Kickoff
Get prepared for your futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to experience risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently, I saw some people discussing a hypothetical scenario: if authorities really wanted to strictly regulate OTC traders, wouldn’t it actually be technically easy to achieve?
Imagine this scenario—the regulators would just need to bulk register accounts on mainstream platforms and conduct a transaction with each of these traders to obtain all the relevant information. But in reality, this kind of operation hasn’t happened on a large scale. What are the considerations behind this? Could things change?
From another perspective, BTC is classified as a commodity in some regions. Since it’s considered a commodity, the legality of buying and selling itself seems justifiable, right? What would happen if people bypassed stablecoins and conducted C2C transactions directly with BTC?
This could trigger a chain reaction: the existing USDT liquidity might be squeezed, and the fastest way to cash out would become converting to BTC first. The shift in demand could directly push up BTC’s price, and new capital entering the market would likely prioritize allocating to BTC. In a sense, this could actually accelerate BTC’s mainstream adoption, encouraging more people to truly hold and use it.
Of course, this is just speculation—the market will always find its own path.