Seriously? Someone just made a comparison that's wild beyond belief - taking a blockchain that barely scrapes together 5 genuine daily active users and benchmarking it against a major DEX aggregator platform. Like, are we even operating in the same reality here?
The audacity to treat these two as remotely comparable baseline metrics is something else. When your chain's daily user count fits on one hand, maybe pump the brakes before drawing parallels to established tracking tools that monitor actual on-chain activity across multiple networks. This whole comparison feels detached from what's actually happening in the space.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-cff9c776
· 18h ago
Oh dear, this comparison is a textbook example of what not to do with supply and demand curves... Five daily active users trying to go head-to-head with a DEX aggregator? Seriously, even Buffett would be impressed—now that's what I call the art of valuation.
View OriginalReply0
ForkTrooper
· 18h ago
NGL, this is just ridiculous. Comparing a chain with 5 daily active users to a top DEX? Am I seeing this wrong?
View OriginalReply0
consensus_whisperer
· 18h ago
Ha, you dare compare yourself to a DEX aggregator with just five daily active users? That’s really overinflated.
View OriginalReply0
New_Ser_Ngmi
· 18h ago
Haha, isn't it just 5 daily active users? You dare to compare that? That's hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
RugpullSurvivor
· 18h ago
Haha, comparing 5 DAUs to mainstream DEXs? That's some confidence, hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
StrawberryIce
· 18h ago
You still dare to benchmark with only 5 daily active users? That takes some serious confidence.
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_therapist
· 18h ago
Ha, even 5 daily active users can be used for comparison? That’s really desperate.
Seriously? Someone just made a comparison that's wild beyond belief - taking a blockchain that barely scrapes together 5 genuine daily active users and benchmarking it against a major DEX aggregator platform. Like, are we even operating in the same reality here?
The audacity to treat these two as remotely comparable baseline metrics is something else. When your chain's daily user count fits on one hand, maybe pump the brakes before drawing parallels to established tracking tools that monitor actual on-chain activity across multiple networks. This whole comparison feels detached from what's actually happening in the space.