On December 15, a meeting that could change the fate of privacy coins is about to take place. This time, the US Securities and Exchange Commission is proactively inviting representatives from the technical side of the crypto community, with the agenda going straight to the core: where should the line be drawn between privacy technology and regulatory boundaries?
The attendee list for this roundtable is quite interesting: Zcash founder Zooko will be present, Aleo’s CEO Koh has also confirmed attendance, and there will be representatives from the American Civil Liberties Union and the Blockchain Association. What does this lineup suggest? It means regulators are not coming to unilaterally declare a verdict; rather, they genuinely want to hear what the tech community has to say.
Looking back at the past year, the privacy track has certainly had a rough time. Tornado Cash developers were arrested, the Samourai wallet was shut down, and the entire privacy technology space has been gasping under regulatory pressure. Now, with the SEC proactively convening this meeting, it reflects a certain reality: pure suppression can't stop technological development, and it’s time to sit down and talk about how to set the rules.
The conflict is actually obvious. The tech side emphasizes that privacy is a fundamental right and that user data should not be arbitrarily monitored; regulators, on the other hand, worry that privacy tools may be used for money laundering or funding illegal activities. Both sides have valid points, but their positions are inherently opposed. This meeting is essentially a test of each side’s bottom line.
For ordinary investors, this timing is quite delicate. Privacy coins like ZEC, XMR, and AZERO have seen a noticeable uptick in interest recently—the market is reacting in advance. But be aware, the outcome of the meeting could go to either extreme: either some kind of compromise is reached, giving privacy technology a compliant space to survive; or the talks break down, leading to a new round of crackdowns.
Personally, I think this meeting is more like a "strategic probe." The SEC doesn't want to completely stifle innovation (after all, the US still wants to maintain a technological edge in crypto), but it also needs to show regulatory presence. The most likely outcome is some form of "limited openness"—for example, requiring privacy technology to integrate selective disclosure mechanisms or setting compliant usage scenarios.
So what should you do now? Keeping a close eye on the news from the 15th is important, but don’t rush to make big bets. You can make small allocations to privacy coin concepts while preparing for both possibilities: increase your position if positive news materializes, or cut losses if negative developments arise. In this kind of policy-driven market, timing is more critical than direction.
The crypto world is shifting from "unregulated growth" to "rule-based competition," and this meeting could be one of the turning points.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ETHmaxi_NoFilter
· 12-06 07:50
To be honest, this meeting is basically a signal that the SEC wants to make peace. If the tech side can really secure a compliant space to survive, that's already a win.
ZEC has indeed been stirring lately, but it's not too late to make a move after the meeting on the 15th. Don't let FOMO trap you.
Privacy coins have always been a political game. The US wants both the halo of innovation and regulatory power, and that's the hardest balance to strike.
The real winners are actually the big institutions that have already positioned themselves. Retail investors are always a step behind when following the trend.
A selective disclosure mechanism—this kind of compromise is the most likely outcome. By then, privacy won't really be privacy anymore, haha.
When Tornado's developer got arrested, I already knew the era of pure privacy was ending. This meeting now is the official start of a surrender.
It's fine to test the waters with a small position, but don't fantasize about getting rich from this wave. Policy-level opportunities have always belonged to institutions.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrier
· 12-06 07:50
It’s the same old “sit down and talk about the rules” trick again, I don’t think it’ll work.
Is the SEC “testing the waters”? To put it bluntly, they just want to cage privacy coins. If you ask me, nothing good will come out of the meeting on the 15th, and in the end, there will have to be some compromise.
Small position allocations sound safe enough, but ZEC just doesn’t feel like it’s really taken off in these past few years…
The key is whether the US is really willing to let go, and it’s not that simple.
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmi
· 12-06 07:43
Bro, this move does look kind of interesting, but ZEC’s price action has been a bit weird these past few days.
If they can really reach a compromise on the 15th, that’d be great, otherwise it’ll get dumped back to square one.
Let’s see how Zooko deals with the SEC when the time comes.
I’ve already put in a small position, just betting on a policy shift. Not much to lose, but not much to win either.
XMR feels a bit more reliable, since it’s more decentralized and the US can’t really touch it.
View OriginalReply0
QuietlyStaking
· 12-06 07:42
To be honest, if ZEC really manages to make a comeback this time, I'll laugh. After being suppressed for so long, it finally has a chance to breathe.
Waiting for the news on the 15th, but I feel like the odds of a compromise are slim... The US side always puts on a show.
It's fine to play with a small position, but don't go all in. I've seen the scenario of talks breaking down too many times.
View OriginalReply0
TokenVelocityTrauma
· 12-06 07:39
To be honest, the fact that the SEC proactively initiated a meeting this time actually gives me hope. It's much more straightforward than suppressing things behind the scenes.
Let's wait for the results. On the 15th, it will either be a breakthrough or a complete mess.
Will ZEC become the benchmark for policy this time... hard to say, but it's worth trying with a small position.
View OriginalReply0
DaoResearcher
· 12-06 07:35
According to the whitepaper, there is essentially an incentive incompatibility issue with the governance proposals of privacy coins. Assuming the SEC can actually push forward the implementation of a "selective disclosure" mechanism this time, then from a tokenomics perspective, the value capture logic of ZEC and XMR would need to be completely restructured. It's worth noting that such restructuring would, within a 95% confidence interval, result in multiple equilibrium outcomes for token holders' game theory. Instead of blindly following trends, it's better to first study the on-chain governance data of each project to see how they are responding.
View OriginalReply0
OnlyUpOnly
· 12-06 07:34
It's another one of those "both sides have a point" stalemates. To put it bluntly, they're just waiting for the SEC to compromise.
Let's wait for the 15th. Anyway, I already got into ZEC with a small position a while ago.
As long as privacy coins aren't completely banned, they'll find a way to survive. The US doesn't really dare to block them all, either.
Everyone buying now is betting on a positive outcome from the meeting, but what if the talks fall apart? I still think it's a 50-50 situation.
This time feels a lot more moderate compared to the Tornado incident. Draw your own conclusions about what that means.
XMR is the real privacy benchmark. As for ZEC's technical prowess... forget it.
On December 15, a meeting that could change the fate of privacy coins is about to take place. This time, the US Securities and Exchange Commission is proactively inviting representatives from the technical side of the crypto community, with the agenda going straight to the core: where should the line be drawn between privacy technology and regulatory boundaries?
The attendee list for this roundtable is quite interesting: Zcash founder Zooko will be present, Aleo’s CEO Koh has also confirmed attendance, and there will be representatives from the American Civil Liberties Union and the Blockchain Association. What does this lineup suggest? It means regulators are not coming to unilaterally declare a verdict; rather, they genuinely want to hear what the tech community has to say.
Looking back at the past year, the privacy track has certainly had a rough time. Tornado Cash developers were arrested, the Samourai wallet was shut down, and the entire privacy technology space has been gasping under regulatory pressure. Now, with the SEC proactively convening this meeting, it reflects a certain reality: pure suppression can't stop technological development, and it’s time to sit down and talk about how to set the rules.
The conflict is actually obvious. The tech side emphasizes that privacy is a fundamental right and that user data should not be arbitrarily monitored; regulators, on the other hand, worry that privacy tools may be used for money laundering or funding illegal activities. Both sides have valid points, but their positions are inherently opposed. This meeting is essentially a test of each side’s bottom line.
For ordinary investors, this timing is quite delicate. Privacy coins like ZEC, XMR, and AZERO have seen a noticeable uptick in interest recently—the market is reacting in advance. But be aware, the outcome of the meeting could go to either extreme: either some kind of compromise is reached, giving privacy technology a compliant space to survive; or the talks break down, leading to a new round of crackdowns.
Personally, I think this meeting is more like a "strategic probe." The SEC doesn't want to completely stifle innovation (after all, the US still wants to maintain a technological edge in crypto), but it also needs to show regulatory presence. The most likely outcome is some form of "limited openness"—for example, requiring privacy technology to integrate selective disclosure mechanisms or setting compliant usage scenarios.
So what should you do now? Keeping a close eye on the news from the 15th is important, but don’t rush to make big bets. You can make small allocations to privacy coin concepts while preparing for both possibilities: increase your position if positive news materializes, or cut losses if negative developments arise. In this kind of policy-driven market, timing is more critical than direction.
The crypto world is shifting from "unregulated growth" to "rule-based competition," and this meeting could be one of the turning points.