#特朗普数字资产政策新方向 The degree of acceptance of $BTC varies greatly across different markets, and this divergence is shaping completely different investment narratives.
From a technical perspective, Bitcoin’s bottom is quietly rising—the support at 78,000 has evolved into a new low at 82,000, and this stepwise upward structure is sending a signal that cannot be ignored. The current key support has moved up to the 85,000 area, and at this pace, a rebound to 96,000 during the Fed’s interest rate decision window is not impossible, though I wouldn't bet on it. At this stage, it looks more like a technical correction rather than a trend reversal, so those calling for a 102,000 target are a bit much for me. If it does pull back to around 85,000, that would actually be a good short-term buying opportunity.
Along with the strengthening market, a series of positive signals have emerged. The US government spending plan, expectations of Fed rate cuts combined with a halt to quantitative tightening, the Bank of Japan finally raising rates... each of these factors is being repeatedly digested by the market. What’s even more interesting is that in BlackRock’s core filing to the SEC, there’s this line: Short-term price fluctuations do not change long-term holding strategies.
The real turning point happened yesterday (December 2). The world’s second-largest asset manager, Vanguard Group—the conservative player that used to scoff at cryptocurrencies—announced it would open up Bitcoin and Ethereum purchasing channels to investors. This is the true face of the capital market: previous refusals were because the price wasn’t yet in their psychological range and because they needed time for retail investors to hand over their chips. Now that prices have dropped, if they don’t act, their clients will be snatched away by BlackRock.
Meanwhile, some US banks have already started advising clients to allocate 1% to 10% of their portfolios to digital assets.
In stark contrast, domestic public opinion is still filled with various bearish voices.
In recent days, the “going to zero” theory is once again trending.
Rumors about quantum computers posing threats, wallets being hacked, Bitcoin being centralized, and so on are popping up one after another.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ImpermanentPhilosopher
· 21h ago
Vanguard's move this time is really impressive. They used to act all high and mighty, now they're the ones who have to admit their mistakes. In front of capital, there's no such thing as faith, haha.
While people in China are still talking about the "zeroing out" theory, banks in the US are already advising clients to allocate digital assets. The information gap is just outrageous.
If 85000 really pulls back, I'll get in. But don't believe those hyping up 102000, just let the correction happen.
I remember what BlackRock said: short-term volatility doesn't change the case for long-term holding. Basically, it's just dollar-cost averaging.
Time really will prove everything, but some people might not make it to that day.
View OriginalReply0
FarmHopper
· 21h ago
This move by Vanguard is really incredible. They used to act so high and mighty, but now they're obediently picking up chips off the ground—hilarious.
Domestically, people keep talking about everything going to zero, while overseas institutions have already been making a fortune quietly. The gap is really impossible to close.
If it really pulls back to 85000, I'm getting in. But honestly, can this rebound hold up to 96? Feels a bit shaky.
Wait, what did BlackRock mean by that statement? Are they hinting at another drop?
As soon as the Fed cuts rates, BTC comes back to life. This logic is becoming more obvious.
View OriginalReply0
VibesOverCharts
· 21h ago
Vanguard really pulled a move this time. Before, they acted all high and mighty, but now they've turned around and opened up the purchase channel. Honestly, it's a bit awkward... That's just how capital is—always so pragmatic.
View OriginalReply0
NFT_Therapy
· 21h ago
Pioneer’s move this time is truly brilliant. They used to act all high and mighty, but now they’re opening their doors to everyone—so funny.
While people at home are still arguing about the “going to zero” theory, institutions have already quietly gotten on board. The gap is really more than just a little.
View OriginalReply0
ProtocolRebel
· 21h ago
Even Vanguard has spoken up, now those bears in China must be really embarrassed.
Daring to call for 102,000—either they're really clear-headed or they've never seen a bear market.
A pullback to 85,000 is indeed a good entry, but don’t get greedy...
Quantum computer threat? Ha, that joke needs to retire already.
One sentence from BlackRock is worth more than ten long articles—that’s just how realistic capital is.
View OriginalReply0
FudVaccinator
· 21h ago
Vanguard’s move this time is truly brilliant. They pretended to know nothing before, and now they’re making a comeback to grab the business. This is the classic “capital’s sweet smell” law.
While people domestically are still chanting curses and predicting it will go to zero, Western asset management giants have already been quietly making a fortune. Time really does prove everything.
View OriginalReply0
RealYieldWizard
· 21h ago
This move by the pioneers is brilliant. They used to act all high and mighty, but now they're getting anxious. To put it bluntly, they're just waiting for retail investors to sell at a loss.
And as for those domestic doomsayers, when the "zero theory" was flooding the screens, how come none of them actually went all-in on shorts?
Quantum computer threat—what a joke. That excuse probably won’t be relevant until who knows when.
#特朗普数字资产政策新方向 The degree of acceptance of $BTC varies greatly across different markets, and this divergence is shaping completely different investment narratives.
From a technical perspective, Bitcoin’s bottom is quietly rising—the support at 78,000 has evolved into a new low at 82,000, and this stepwise upward structure is sending a signal that cannot be ignored. The current key support has moved up to the 85,000 area, and at this pace, a rebound to 96,000 during the Fed’s interest rate decision window is not impossible, though I wouldn't bet on it. At this stage, it looks more like a technical correction rather than a trend reversal, so those calling for a 102,000 target are a bit much for me. If it does pull back to around 85,000, that would actually be a good short-term buying opportunity.
Along with the strengthening market, a series of positive signals have emerged. The US government spending plan, expectations of Fed rate cuts combined with a halt to quantitative tightening, the Bank of Japan finally raising rates... each of these factors is being repeatedly digested by the market. What’s even more interesting is that in BlackRock’s core filing to the SEC, there’s this line: Short-term price fluctuations do not change long-term holding strategies.
The real turning point happened yesterday (December 2). The world’s second-largest asset manager, Vanguard Group—the conservative player that used to scoff at cryptocurrencies—announced it would open up Bitcoin and Ethereum purchasing channels to investors. This is the true face of the capital market: previous refusals were because the price wasn’t yet in their psychological range and because they needed time for retail investors to hand over their chips. Now that prices have dropped, if they don’t act, their clients will be snatched away by BlackRock.
Meanwhile, some US banks have already started advising clients to allocate 1% to 10% of their portfolios to digital assets.
In stark contrast, domestic public opinion is still filled with various bearish voices.
In recent days, the “going to zero” theory is once again trending.
Rumors about quantum computers posing threats, wallets being hacked, Bitcoin being centralized, and so on are popping up one after another.
All I can say is, let time prove everything.