Attention ZEC holders, the most critical scene of this rate cut drama is unfolding.



The Trump camp is making increasingly obvious moves. His nominated economic advisor, Hassett, recently stated publicly: next week’s FOMC meeting must deliver a rate cut. Even more intriguing, there used to be several candidates on the list for Fed Chair, but now only Hassett remains. The signal this sends is clear—once he takes over, a shift in monetary policy might come much faster than expected.

Economic data is also supporting this narrative. The ADP jobs report unexpectedly turned negative, and the employment component of the services index has been shrinking for six consecutive months. This data has given the rate-cut advocates plenty of ammunition, and market bets on a December rate cut have soared to 87%. Almost everyone is waiting for the Fed’s final confirmation.

But is it really that simple?

Deutsche Bank just issued a warning: the current economic fundamentals may not support such aggressive rate cut expectations from the market. Hawkish members within the Fed are still fighting hard on the inflation issue, and Powell himself has repeatedly stressed the Fed’s independence. Those in the know are well aware of the discord between him and Trump.

This is the situation now: on one side, you have Hassett representing the “dovish camp,” with a clear slogan—cut rates quickly, keep them low; on the other side, Powell leads the “data-driven camp,” insisting on following the indicators and refusing to yield to political pressure.

The power struggle is at a fever pitch. The market is feverishly betting on a rosy “liquidity flood” story, but what the Fed ultimately delivers may well be just a cautious tweak. The gap between expectations and reality is often the most dangerous place.

So, for next week’s meeting, will it be “good news delivers another rally,” or “overblown expectations lead to a reversal and losses”? This is a question every position holder should consider seriously.

Which side do you trust more? Trump’s push for aggressive easing, or Powell’s steadfast independent judgment?

ETH’s price action may also be directly affected by the outcome.
ZEC5.91%
ETH3.3%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TokenomicsTherapistvip
· 12-06 05:50
Honestly, I’ve seen this script way too many times, and it always ends with expectations collapsing. 87% betting on a December rate cut? That number itself is very risky. Powell won’t compromise that quickly; the more political pressure there is, the tougher he’ll get. There will definitely be minor adjustments at next week’s meeting, then spot markets will dump right after. ZEC moves with ETH volatility—I think it’s just waiting to get buried. Instead of stressing over who wins, it’s better to set your own stop-loss first. When the whole market is bullish, that’s often the most dangerous signal... Hasn’t it always been like this the last few times? Everyone expects a flood of liquidity, but all we get are minor patches. The hawks are still stubbornly holding up the inflation data; there’s no way they’ll just flip overnight. This gap really can kill people—I’ve seen too many get wrecked by broken expectations.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerWalletvip
· 12-06 05:40
An 87% probability sounds great, but I'm betting that Powell will give the market a slap in the face. Seriously, it's always like this: the market gets hyped up betting on rate cuts, then the Fed comes out and says "we still need to watch the data," and then we break below support levels. The gap between expectations and reality is a bloodbath machine. No matter how much pressure Hassett faces, it won't change the Fed's independence. Instead of waiting for the meeting results, it's better to take profits early. Retail investors always get the short end of the stick in these political games. If you bet wrong, it's another round of losses.
View OriginalReply0
WalletWhisperervip
· 12-06 05:35
the gap between 87% priced-in and powell's actual move is where the real liquidations hide. behavioral data screaming one direction while address clustering shows whales rotating into stables... classic divergence setup. either way, someone's getting rekt next week.
Reply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)