Breaking news! Monet Bank, owned by billionaire Andy Beal, has officially entered the crypto lending sector. While the bank itself isn't huge, the signal behind this move can't be ignored—remember, Andy Beal is one of the key supporters of former US presidents.
Why is this worth paying attention to? When traditional financial institutions, especially those with political connections, start making moves in crypto, what does it mean? It means the industry's infrastructure is quietly being embraced by mainstream capital. Monet is like a catfish stirring up the pond, and could very well encourage more "regular troops" who are still on the sidelines to test the waters, injecting new energy into the market.
That being said, don't get carried away just yet. This is at best a positive indicator, not a guarantee the bull market is about to start. In the short term, the market will keep fluctuating as it always does—volatility isn't going anywhere.
My view: stay alert, but hold off on acting for now. The key is to watch if more traditional financial players follow suit.
Keep your cool, wait until the situation becomes clearer, and then make decisions based on your own positions—that's how smart money plays the game.
Don't forget, market news is just seasoning—your trading discipline is the main course!
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
UncommonNPC
· 12-06 03:44
Uh... Can politicians really pump the market just by endorsing it? I don't buy it.
---
Mainstream capital entering the market sounds exciting, but we're still a long way from seeing real money pouring in.
---
Another disruptor stirring things up... In our circle, rumors fly everywhere. Who's actually putting in real money?
---
To put it plainly, it's still just an infrastructure upgrade. Don't think of it as some huge positive; at best, it's just not that negative.
---
Let's wait and see if anyone follows up. Why make a fuss now? Even if something big happens, retail investors like us won't benefit.
---
Isn't it just a small bank? Why is everyone hyping it up like it's something huge...
---
Keeping a steady mindset is good, but someone says this before every market move, and people still end up losing money.
---
I just want to know if this Andy Beal really wants to do financial business, or is he just using this as an excuse to make a quick buck off retail investors?
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerGas
· 12-06 03:43
The significance of political capital testing the waters in crypto has been overly dramatized; the key is still to watch the on-chain capital flows.
To put it simply, it’s a signaling game. No matter how efficient the market is, it still takes real money to test it.
Andy Beal making moves ≠ institutions entering en masse—there’s a world of interaction costs in between.
Wait, is this paving the way for more favorable policies down the road? That’s interesting.
Thought of another arbitrage opportunity at night. For now, it’s still the observation period—don’t get caught up in emotions.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationHunter
· 12-06 03:43
Another sign of a pump-and-dump; let's wait and see.
View OriginalReply0
MemeEchoer
· 12-06 03:38
Don’t be fooled, everyone. Political figures entering the market ≠ guaranteed positive news. If it’s meant to fall, it will still fall.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiGrayling
· 12-06 03:32
Here we go again, every time they say "positive signals," last time they said that BTC dropped 20%...
---
Traditional finance giants entering the market is indeed aggressive, but I think it's better to wait and see—don't get caught holding the bag.
---
This guy is right. News is just news, your own discipline is what matters most.
---
Monet entering the market? Then let's wait and see if there's a second or third one following. One bank can't change much.
---
"Indicator," "fresh blood"—feels like we hear these terms every year.
---
Just based on Andy Beal's connections, there's definitely more to come, but don't make any moves in the short term.
---
This is getting old. The logic that big capital entering = bullish news is something I'm tired of hearing.
---
Staying put is the right move. There's no rush, and the market isn't going anywhere.
---
So are we supposed to enter or not? This article basically says nothing.
---
Is traditional finance really serious this time? I doubt it. Let's see if anyone else follows suit.
View OriginalReply0
MoneyBurnerSociety
· 12-06 03:24
Here comes another "signal significance"... The last time I heard this term was when I bought the dip and got stuck.
Breaking news! Monet Bank, owned by billionaire Andy Beal, has officially entered the crypto lending sector. While the bank itself isn't huge, the signal behind this move can't be ignored—remember, Andy Beal is one of the key supporters of former US presidents.
Why is this worth paying attention to? When traditional financial institutions, especially those with political connections, start making moves in crypto, what does it mean? It means the industry's infrastructure is quietly being embraced by mainstream capital. Monet is like a catfish stirring up the pond, and could very well encourage more "regular troops" who are still on the sidelines to test the waters, injecting new energy into the market.
That being said, don't get carried away just yet. This is at best a positive indicator, not a guarantee the bull market is about to start. In the short term, the market will keep fluctuating as it always does—volatility isn't going anywhere.
My view: stay alert, but hold off on acting for now. The key is to watch if more traditional financial players follow suit.
Keep your cool, wait until the situation becomes clearer, and then make decisions based on your own positions—that's how smart money plays the game.
Don't forget, market news is just seasoning—your trading discipline is the main course!