I've always found it bizarre how people romanticize being small, broke, or fragile. Like there's some moral high ground in staying weak? That's not virtuous—that's just convenient storytelling.
The victim-first lens doesn't sit right with me. Never has. Why glorify vulnerability when you could build defenses instead?
Here's what I believe: you owe it to yourself—and honestly, to the people around you—to level up. Get richer. Expand your footprint. Strengthen your position. That's not greed; that's responsibility. In this game, being less exposed to risk isn't optional. It's the only rational move.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OnchainDetective
· 14h ago
Wait, let me break down this logic... Saying "vulnerability has a moral halo" is just a "convenient narrative"? According to on-chain data, this kind of rhetoric usually goes hand-in-hand with project teams that loudly promote "self-improvement." After analysis and assessment, such statements are often laying the groundwork for the subsequent concentration of wealth.
It's obvious... The more they say "you need to become stronger," the more they legitimize power imbalances.
View OriginalReply0
MoneyBurnerSociety
· 12-05 20:55
Ah... this is yet another "blaming the weak" argument, but to be honest, it's been proven in crypto: accounts with stronger risk resistance do survive longer than us 🤷
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiLeftOnRead
· 12-05 20:50
ngl this viewpoint is a bit harsh, but it does make sense... Rather than playing the victim and telling stories, it's better to actually make yourself stronger.
View OriginalReply0
RugResistant
· 12-05 20:49
To be honest, I've heard this argument too many times, but it does hit a nerve for a lot of people. Those who treat poverty as a virtue and weakness as a quality... to put it bluntly, it's just self-deception.
View OriginalReply0
RugpullAlertOfficer
· 12-05 20:38
Well said, there's really nothing admirable about being weak. I'm tired of hearing those cliches.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketMonk
· 12-05 20:34
Honestly, I've heard this "fragility is a virtue" narrative way too many times. Every time a bear market hits, that group of people comes out and preaches as if losses alone can somehow cleanse your soul.
View OriginalReply0
MagicBean
· 12-05 20:32
This is exactly what I've been wanting to say. Is pretending to be weak, poor, or fragile supposed to be a virtue? That's pure nonsense.
Well said. Self-improvement is what truly honors yourself and those around you.
I've always found it bizarre how people romanticize being small, broke, or fragile. Like there's some moral high ground in staying weak? That's not virtuous—that's just convenient storytelling.
The victim-first lens doesn't sit right with me. Never has. Why glorify vulnerability when you could build defenses instead?
Here's what I believe: you owe it to yourself—and honestly, to the people around you—to level up. Get richer. Expand your footprint. Strengthen your position. That's not greed; that's responsibility. In this game, being less exposed to risk isn't optional. It's the only rational move.