European regulators just slapped a major social media platform with a €120 million penalty. The charge sheet? Three strikes that matter for anyone watching how tech governance evolves.
First up: that blue verification badge everyone obsesses over turned out to be more misleading than helpful. Then there's the murky ad ecosystem—transparency was apparently optional. But here's the kicker that crypto folks should note: blocking independent researchers from accessing publicly available data.
That last point hits different when you're building in an industry that champions open data and verifiable information. Traditional platforms gatekeep while preaching openness. Meanwhile, blockchain protocols are literally designed around public, permissionless data access.
The fine itself matters less than what it signals. Regulators are finally scrutinizing how centralized platforms handle information flow and user trust. For Web3 builders, this validates the thesis: transparency isn't a feature request anymore—it's becoming a regulatory requirement.
Makes you wonder how many other platforms are playing similar games with verification systems and data access.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PancakeFlippa
· 12-05 16:00
A €12 billion fine doesn't really hurt; what's crucial is that centralized platforms are finally being targeted. Now, the story of Web3 can be told with more conviction.
View OriginalReply0
just_here_for_vibes
· 12-05 16:00
While traditional big companies tout openness, they operate behind closed doors. Fortunately, regulators have finally stepped in.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketMonk
· 12-05 15:57
EU fines are nothing more than a paper tiger; the key point is that one sentence hit the mark—data blockade. Traditional platforms preach openness while building walls, which is highly ironic. Transparency should have always been a survival rule, not some novel demand. It’s a cycle that keeps repeating, brother.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleMistaker
· 12-05 15:57
Really, that slap was satisfying. Finally, someone is taking action against those centralized platforms. We've been saying all along: without transparency, how can they still dare to call themselves innovative?
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterBearish
· 12-05 15:41
Haha, it's the same old trick again. The blue checkmark scam should have been investigated long ago. These centralized platforms are really ridiculous—on one hand they talk about openness, on the other they lock data down. We in blockchain shouldn't play this game either.
View OriginalReply0
alpha_leaker
· 12-05 15:39
Centralized platforms lock data while claiming to be open—what a joke. This is exactly why we need the blockchain.
European regulators just slapped a major social media platform with a €120 million penalty. The charge sheet? Three strikes that matter for anyone watching how tech governance evolves.
First up: that blue verification badge everyone obsesses over turned out to be more misleading than helpful. Then there's the murky ad ecosystem—transparency was apparently optional. But here's the kicker that crypto folks should note: blocking independent researchers from accessing publicly available data.
That last point hits different when you're building in an industry that champions open data and verifiable information. Traditional platforms gatekeep while preaching openness. Meanwhile, blockchain protocols are literally designed around public, permissionless data access.
The fine itself matters less than what it signals. Regulators are finally scrutinizing how centralized platforms handle information flow and user trust. For Web3 builders, this validates the thesis: transparency isn't a feature request anymore—it's becoming a regulatory requirement.
Makes you wonder how many other platforms are playing similar games with verification systems and data access.