Recent shifts in U.S. policy documents reveal a dramatic pivot on energy priorities. The 2022 strategic framework referenced environmental concerns 63 times across its pages. Fast forward to the latest version? Just a single mention—and that's to explicitly dismiss the topic.
This isn't just paperwork shuffling. It signals a fundamental realignment in how the current administration views energy regulation and environmental commitments. For industries tied to energy consumption—including blockchain infrastructure and mining operations—this policy U-turn could reshape compliance landscapes and investment strategies going forward.
The contrast is stark: from climate-centric language dominating official strategy to near-total removal in less than three years. Whether you see this as pragmatic recalibration or concerning reversal, one thing's certain: the regulatory winds have shifted direction.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
rugpull_survivor
· 59m ago
From 63 times to 1 time? That’s an insane change, cracks me up.
---
Environmental protection went from the main course to a footnote; miners are probably celebrating in secret.
---
Erasing environmental protection on paper ≠ the problem disappears; in the end, there’s still a price to pay.
---
That’s it? A single official document can change the direction of energy policy? Yeah, right.
---
Blockchain miners: “Thank you, environmental policy. Now we can go full throttle.”
---
From climate declarations to outright deletion—the speed is unreal… This move is really something.
---
The regulatory winds have shifted, but the Earth is still spinning.
---
With energy policy changing like this, what kind of tricks are they planning next?
View OriginalReply0
defi_detective
· 21h ago
From 63 times to 1 time, this change is just unbelievable... The miners are probably going to pop champagne.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBuilder
· 12-05 21:44
From 63 times to 1 time, that's a pretty drastic change. Miners will probably have to recalculate everything.
View OriginalReply0
MeaninglessGwei
· 12-05 14:54
63 cuts to 1—this contrast is truly incredible. The miners are probably going to be ecstatic.
View OriginalReply0
OffchainOracle
· 12-05 14:41
From 63 times to just 1 time, that’s a crazy change!
View OriginalReply0
AirdropSkeptic
· 12-05 14:39
From 63 times down to just 1? That's wild—the policy direction sure shifted dramatically.
View OriginalReply0
BanklessAtHeart
· 12-05 14:35
From 63 times down to 1 time, this change is truly unbelievable... The miners must be popping champagne.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketLightning
· 12-05 14:31
From 63 times to 1 time, that’s a huge turnaround... The miners must be thrilled now.
---
The environmental topic has been kicked off the main stage—wake up, everyone.
---
Just tweaking the paperwork is enough? The compliance card needs to be played again.
---
A complete reversal in less than three years—I just want to know who’s pulling the strings behind the scenes.
---
With this shift in energy policy, the cost structure for mining needs to be recalculated.
---
Behind the drop from 63 to 1, real interests are making themselves heard.
Recent shifts in U.S. policy documents reveal a dramatic pivot on energy priorities. The 2022 strategic framework referenced environmental concerns 63 times across its pages. Fast forward to the latest version? Just a single mention—and that's to explicitly dismiss the topic.
This isn't just paperwork shuffling. It signals a fundamental realignment in how the current administration views energy regulation and environmental commitments. For industries tied to energy consumption—including blockchain infrastructure and mining operations—this policy U-turn could reshape compliance landscapes and investment strategies going forward.
The contrast is stark: from climate-centric language dominating official strategy to near-total removal in less than three years. Whether you see this as pragmatic recalibration or concerning reversal, one thing's certain: the regulatory winds have shifted direction.