Leading exchange drops a bombshell on December 3rd - dual CEO structure is now official. He Yi broke the news to media outlets, explaining this isn't some random experiment. Turns out, co-CEO setups? Pretty standard in traditional finance circles.



Her take is straightforward: two heads working in sync can pull off way more than twice what one CEO manages solo. The "1+1>2" math actually checks out here. But here's the kicker - this whole restructuring? It's apparently part of some bigger strategic play they've got cooking.

What's interesting is the timing. Why roll this out now? He Yi hints there's a larger vision at work, though she keeps the details close to the vest for now. The dual-leadership model could reshape how top-tier platforms operate going forward.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FancyResearchLabvip
· 12h ago
Dual-CEO system? In theory, it should work, but I'll bet five bucks these two will end up fighting over some smart contract sooner or later. This 1+1>2 logic might work in traditional finance, but in the crypto world... Luban No.7 is back at work again. The mysterious "strategic master plan"—let me try it out first and see how deep this pit really is.
View OriginalReply0
SerumSquirrelvip
· 19h ago
Dual-CEO system? Sounds like they're going for a tag-team approach, but will it just end up being all talk and no action...
View OriginalReply0
TheShibaWhisperervip
· 12-06 20:59
Dual CEO system? Yeah, right. Let's see if it can really make 1+1>2. Anyway, everything's pretty unpredictable these days.
View OriginalReply0
MEVictimvip
· 12-05 14:55
Dual CEO system? Sounds fancy, but in reality... it's just to make passing the buck easier.
View OriginalReply0
ChainWallflowervip
· 12-05 14:52
Dual-CEO system? Sounds nice, but to me it feels like power is just being split... --- This "1+1>2" theory sounds like pseudo-science; in reality, both people usually have their own ideas... --- Why announce it at this time? There must be something about to happen. --- Can traditional finance models really be directly applied to Web3? I have my doubts. --- If they're so tight-lipped, how can they talk about big visions? Let's wait and see what happens next. --- Is this about balancing power or just making it easier to pass the buck? Hard to say. --- The timing is just too perfect... hmm, definitely feels like something's up.
View OriginalReply0
InscriptionGrillervip
· 12-05 14:35
Dual-CEO structure? Ha, it’s just another “1+1>2” gimmick—an old trick from traditional finance now being recycled in the crypto space. Just wait, the timing is way too suspicious. They’re definitely plotting some big move to fleece retail investors again. One CEO can’t run anymore, so now two CEOs will run together—is this an attempt to accelerate the death spiral?
View OriginalReply0
StableNomadvip
· 12-05 14:30
nah 1+1>2 only works if they're actually not stepping on each other's toes... statistically speaking, dual ceos usually end up as dual problems lol. reminds me of UST in May, two visionary guys, zero alignment, total collapse
Reply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)