Instead, take that USDC and distribute it to the folks on the whitelist and JUP stakers who got completely shut out. They showed up, they held their tokens, but never got a shot at the launch.
Seems like a cleaner way to reward the actual community instead of bailing out quick-flip artists. Just saying.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MeaninglessApe
· 12-05 20:27
Haha, I like this idea. Why should snipers get a refund? The whitelist holders are the real fans.
View OriginalReply0
0xInsomnia
· 12-05 13:00
No refunds for snipers, instead giving them to whitelist and JUP holders. I love this logic—this is exactly how it should be done.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-44a00d6c
· 12-05 12:51
Haha, I like this idea. Bottom fishers deserve to get rekt; only true believers should profit.
View OriginalReply0
StakoorNeverSleeps
· 12-05 12:44
The attitude is good, but reality isn't that simple, bro.
View OriginalReply0
Deconstructionist
· 12-05 12:35
Nah, this logic is a bit off. Why punish snipers? They're also playing with their own money.
View OriginalReply0
LiquiditySurfer
· 12-05 12:31
Hmm, this logic makes some sense. Rather than refunding the snipers, it's better to distribute a portion directly to the real HODLers. This approach is indeed much more capital efficient and pleasing to see.
Here's a thought:
What if we skip refunding those snipers?
Instead, take that USDC and distribute it to the folks on the whitelist and JUP stakers who got completely shut out. They showed up, they held their tokens, but never got a shot at the launch.
Seems like a cleaner way to reward the actual community instead of bailing out quick-flip artists. Just saying.