This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CodeAuditQueen
· 4h ago
The logic is the same for both tokens, it's just a matter of which one moves first. But we need to check if the contract has any reentrancy vulnerabilities...
View OriginalReply0
HashRateHustler
· 23h ago
Both coins are just schemes to fleece retail investors—pump the price first, then dump it. It's such an old trick...
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterXM
· 12-05 08:56
It's the same old trick—one person pumps, the others follow. Do they really think we're all retail investors?
View OriginalReply0
AltcoinHunter
· 12-05 08:51
It’s the same old “one moves first, the others follow” play—I’ve seen it too many times. There’s definitely logic on the capital flow side, but the ones who really make millions are always those who understand timing... I’m the type who always gets the timing wrong, haha.
View OriginalReply0
BasementAlchemist
· 12-05 08:43
This whole first-mover mining thing... one drives another, it's probably another trick of capital rotation.
$Pinheads and $Troll? They're basically the same play.
One pumps, the other follows.
Millions incoming for both tokens.