Tom Lee's Bitmine has made another big move recently—$131 million directly spent to scoop up ETH. That number alone says a lot.
Let’s do the math. For these institutions, $131 million might just be a rounding error in a quarterly budget. But for ordinary investors? That’s a ceiling most people will never even get close to in a lifetime. More importantly, purchases of this scale are hardly just for short-term trading profits.
Every time there’s such a large buy-in, a chunk of ETH available for free trading in the market gets locked up. The circulating supply shrinks, and the pricing power shifts. When one entity accumulates enough holdings, its influence on the market grows exponentially. At that point, a single tweet from them could outweigh the voices of ten thousand retail investors.
A lot of times, when you see headlines everywhere saying "institution increases holdings again,"
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ThesisInvestor
· 3h ago
Here we go again with this narrative. Does buying 1.31 billion mean we have to bow down? Wake up, retail investors still collectively hold more chips—don’t get scared off so easily.
I can't stand this "institutions control everything" rhetoric; it feels way too fatalistic. A shrinking float doesn’t automatically mean all pricing power is gone. The market isn’t that simple.
Honestly, it still comes down to fundamentals. What’s wrong with Tom Lee being bullish on ETH? Why does everything have to be about a power shift?
A single tweet outweighs the voices of thousands? Dream on. Real value comes from actual use cases and the ecosystem.
But to be fair, building a position of this size does show institutional confidence—just don’t overinterpret it.
View OriginalReply0
0xSleepDeprived
· 3h ago
1.31 billion buying spree? Retail investors like us don't even have the right to watch the show.
Institutions pump, we hold the bag. This game has never been fair.
Another tweet wipes out thousands of retail investors in seconds, hilarious.
That's why I'm still hovering around the poverty line... One decision from a whale changes everything.
Wait, this logic doesn't add up... Less circulation means pricing power shifts, so shouldn't we be hodling even more?
View OriginalReply0
MysteryBoxBuster
· 3h ago
Here we go again. As soon as the whales sweep up ETH, there’s a barrage of news. All us retail investors can do is watch our shares get diluted... Seriously, the circulating supply is getting smaller and smaller, and we no longer have any say in the pricing.
Tom Lee's Bitmine has made another big move recently—$131 million directly spent to scoop up ETH. That number alone says a lot.
Let’s do the math. For these institutions, $131 million might just be a rounding error in a quarterly budget. But for ordinary investors? That’s a ceiling most people will never even get close to in a lifetime. More importantly, purchases of this scale are hardly just for short-term trading profits.
Every time there’s such a large buy-in, a chunk of ETH available for free trading in the market gets locked up. The circulating supply shrinks, and the pricing power shifts. When one entity accumulates enough holdings, its influence on the market grows exponentially. At that point, a single tweet from them could outweigh the voices of ten thousand retail investors.
A lot of times, when you see headlines everywhere saying "institution increases holdings again,"