The dominant lending protocol controlling 72% of crypto interest flows just made a power move—blocking a competitor's $11.2B TVL from accepting a major stablecoin as collateral. Here's the kicker: that competitor, running on forked code, only kicked back $1.7M in revenue share while reportedly routing fees through alternative channels. Turns out you can fork the codebase, but the economic reality? That's a different beast. Protocol wars aren't just about tech anymore—they're about who controls the value flow.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AllTalkLongTrader
· 2h ago
You think you can just fork the code and get a free ride? Economic reality will teach you a lesson.
View OriginalReply0
ZenChainWalker
· 12-05 07:31
72% of the traffic is monopolized by one company—what kind of strength does it take to control things to that extent?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationOracle
· 12-05 06:56
Forking code is so easy, but making money is really not.
View OriginalReply0
GasGuzzler
· 12-05 06:54
You think you can just fork some code and win effortlessly? Keep dreaming—money is the real boss.
View OriginalReply0
DeFi_Dad_Jokes
· 12-05 06:51
Forking code is easy, but making money and splitting the profits is the real challenge.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMisery
· 12-05 06:51
Forking code is easy; controlling the flow of funds is what truly matters... that's the real moat.
View OriginalReply0
Deconstructionist
· 12-05 06:35
You think you can just fork some code and cash in? That's naive, bro—the value flow game isn't that simple.
The dominant lending protocol controlling 72% of crypto interest flows just made a power move—blocking a competitor's $11.2B TVL from accepting a major stablecoin as collateral. Here's the kicker: that competitor, running on forked code, only kicked back $1.7M in revenue share while reportedly routing fees through alternative channels. Turns out you can fork the codebase, but the economic reality? That's a different beast. Protocol wars aren't just about tech anymore—they're about who controls the value flow.