[Chain News] In the past month, which projects in the AI and big data sectors have been the most active in development? According to GitHub data, Internet Computer (ICP) and Chainlink (LINK) still firmly hold the top two spots, consistently leading in technical investment. NEAR Protocol, Oasis Network, and Filecoin follow closely behind, maintaining steady output.
Notably, the project Recall has suddenly gained momentum, with its ranking rising rapidly—it’s clear that the development team is working on something big. In contrast, development activity for The Graph, iExec, and Injective has cooled down a bit, with their rankings dropping several places.
This ranking list is actually quite valuable as a reference—after all, the frequency and quality of code commits to some extent reflect whether project teams are truly working on AI and big data, or just stuck at the PowerPoint stage. For those who care about technical fundamentals, GitHub activity is a good observation window.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ConsensusDissenter
· 12-05 13:09
Why did recall suddenly surge? Is it real technology or just a marketing gimmick?
---
ICP and LINK are still holding steady, but are the people who really care still looking at the code?
---
The Graph has cooled off... Feels like as soon as the AI hype started, all kinds of projects jumped on the bandwagon, but few of them are actually reliable.
---
What does GitHub commit frequency really mean? Developers writing logs also count as commits.
---
Is this recall wave for real or just another round of hype? Let's wait and see.
---
NEAR has been consistently delivering, but there's no real buzz. Meanwhile, stuff like recall takes off like crazy.
---
If you ask me, developer activity can only be used as a reference. In the end, you still have to see real-world adoption.
View OriginalReply0
PanicSeller69
· 12-05 02:28
Recall suddenly taking off is indeed quite interesting, but what does GitHub activity really indicate? Anyway, I still judge by the token price.
View OriginalReply0
AlgoAlchemist
· 12-05 02:26
Recall suddenly taking off? Is it about to overtake?
---
ICP and LINK are still top-tier, no surprise there. But Recall's recent moves are indeed pretty fierce.
---
Does having more code necessarily mean something? Not really, sometimes you have to look at the quality, bro.
---
Why has The Graph cooled down? Wasn't it quite active before?
---
The whole "saving a big move" thing... usually just a smokescreen, haha.
---
Is GitHub data reliable? Feels like it can be easily faked.
---
NEAR and Filecoin keep delivering steadily, these two are indeed solid.
---
Feels like Recall is about to rise, gotta keep an eye on it.
---
What does developer activity really represent? In the end, it all depends on whether the ecosystem actually gets used.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperer
· 12-05 02:20
Recall is really making a strong move this time, going from unknown to surging suddenly. Feels like they're up to something.
---
ICP and LINK are still those two big brothers, rock solid as always. The only question is how long LINK's AI narrative can last this time.
---
Is The Graph cooling down? It was hyped so much before, how did it fall behind? Interesting.
---
What does developer commit frequency really show? I'm more curious if they're just copy-pasting, haha.
---
Recall suddenly making moves here—are they about to launch a token or do they actually have something real?
---
Looks like ICP never took a break, and NEAR is pretty steady too. These two are actually getting things done.
---
The Graph really dropped the ball. What happened to all those claims about how awesome it was?
---
Recall jumped in and grabbed a spot right away. This pace feels a bit like the prelude to a pump-and-dump.
---
Leaderboards for code activity have been worthless for a while now. These projects can just fake a few commits and hit the trending list.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-1a2ed0b9
· 12-05 02:15
Recall suddenly shot up, this move is definitely interesting... ICP and LINK are still firmly holding the top two spots, feels like it's become standard practice.
---
By the way, what happened to The Graph? Wasn't it doing pretty well before?
---
What does GitHub commit frequency even prove? Teams that are actually building sometimes just quietly get things done, they don't need to constantly show off their presence.
---
Recall suddenly pumped, is this a big deal... need to see what they've been up to lately.
---
NEAR and Filecoin are still delivering steadily, at least their attitude is clear.
---
Judging a project just by code volume is kind of one-sided... quality is what really matters.
AI and Big Data Track Development Activity Rankings: ICP and LINK Continue to Lead, Recall Rises Rapidly
[Chain News] In the past month, which projects in the AI and big data sectors have been the most active in development? According to GitHub data, Internet Computer (ICP) and Chainlink (LINK) still firmly hold the top two spots, consistently leading in technical investment. NEAR Protocol, Oasis Network, and Filecoin follow closely behind, maintaining steady output.
Notably, the project Recall has suddenly gained momentum, with its ranking rising rapidly—it’s clear that the development team is working on something big. In contrast, development activity for The Graph, iExec, and Injective has cooled down a bit, with their rankings dropping several places.
This ranking list is actually quite valuable as a reference—after all, the frequency and quality of code commits to some extent reflect whether project teams are truly working on AI and big data, or just stuck at the PowerPoint stage. For those who care about technical fundamentals, GitHub activity is a good observation window.