2025-12-05 01:32:52

A recent panel hosted by the SEC turned into an unexpected battlefield—tokenization sparked a head-on clash between the old guard of traditional finance and crypto natives over what decentralization actually means. TradeFi representatives seemed to view tokens as just another digital wrapper for existing assets, while crypto folks pushed back hard on the idea that centralized control could coexist with true blockchain ethos. The meeting exposed something deeper: these two worlds still speak completely different languages when it comes to ownership, control, and the future of financial infrastructure. You could practically feel the tension as regulatory officials tried navigating between Wall Street's comfort zone and crypto's wild west principles. Turns out, getting legacy finance and decentralized systems to agree on basic definitions might be harder than solving the scalability trilemma.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MetaverseHermit

· 20h ago

Those people at the SEC really don't get it. Tokenization is such a simple thing, yet they still argue about it. Traditional finance is just a different wrapper; they completely miss the point of decentralization. The old school and the new school simply can't communicate—they're not even talking about the same thing. This is even harder to solve than the scalability trilemma, haha, it's hilarious. It's literally two parallel worlds having a meeting—no wonder the regulators all get headaches.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeSobber

· 12-05 04:59

This meeting with the SEC is really like a chicken talking to a duck—TradFi is still playing the centralized game, while the crypto folks are already getting impatient.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropATM

· 12-05 02:01

Traditional finance and crypto will never be able to communicate; the language barrier is unbeatable.

View OriginalReply0

SelfSovereignSteve

· 12-05 01:58

Those people in traditional finance really don't understand what decentralization means. They just insist on packaging tokens as digital assets and think that's it. It's frustrating.

View OriginalReply0

TokenAlchemist

· 12-05 01:52

lmao, traditional finance still thinks tokenization is just cosmetics. they're literally missing the entire asymmetric return surface here—if you can't grok protocol dynamics, don't even show up to the table. scalability trilemma takes a backseat to this semantic warfare tbh

Reply0

SchroedingersFrontrun

· 12-05 01:38

Those TradFi people really want to force crypto into their framework, it's hilarious—they're not even the same thing.

View OriginalReply0

WalletsWatcher

· 12-05 01:34

That SEC scene directly proved that TradFi and crypto simply cannot unify their discourse; each speaks its own language.

View OriginalReply0