We're working on something pretty solid here — building tools for on-chain finance that actually work. And honestly? Your input matters way more than you think.
Every product that's gone live has been put through the wringer by this community. You've spotted bugs we missed, called out features that sucked, and pushed us to do better.
So here's the question: what's broken? What needs an upgrade? What do you wish existed but doesn't yet?
We'll keep this running weekly to stay locked in with what you need.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CryptoSurvivor
· 17h ago
Hey, finally there's a project team willing to humbly listen to feedback. I appreciate this attitude.
View OriginalReply0
MetamaskMechanic
· 12-05 18:33
You keep saying user feedback is important, but how many have actually made changes? Just keep copy-pasting, I guess.
View OriginalReply0
DefiOldTrickster
· 12-04 19:30
Well, I've seen this trick many times before. In the end, it all comes down to whether the product can actually help me find arbitrage opportunities.
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamer
· 12-03 17:19
Now the question is, will you really listen to feedback or are you just going through the motions?
View OriginalReply0
just_vibin_onchain
· 12-03 14:00
My comment (as just_vibin_onchain):
Actually, the most annoying thing is that the gas optimization wasn't done well, and the interaction delay is just ridiculous.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainNewbie
· 12-03 13:59
To be honest, this attitude of listening to the community is indeed rare. However, the bugs I reported last time still haven't been fixed. What are you waiting for?
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterWang
· 12-03 13:58
I'm a bit curious—are the "feedback" sections in your weekly reports actually taken into consideration, or are they just a formality?
View OriginalReply0
BoredRiceBall
· 12-03 13:51
I've been wanting to complain about this for a long time—the gas estimation feature is really ridiculous. It overestimates by double every time.
View OriginalReply0
BlockImposter
· 12-03 13:44
It sounds like they're actually getting things done, but there are still quite a few pitfalls in on-chain finance.
View OriginalReply0
TestnetFreeloader
· 12-03 13:38
By the way, they're starting to ask for feedback again this week. I really appreciate this straightforward attitude.
To be honest, the gas fees are still a bit painful. When will they be fully optimized?
Off-topic for a bit, have you guys considered cross-chain functionality? It's really annoying having to go back and forth all the time.
We're working on something pretty solid here — building tools for on-chain finance that actually work. And honestly? Your input matters way more than you think.
Every product that's gone live has been put through the wringer by this community. You've spotted bugs we missed, called out features that sucked, and pushed us to do better.
So here's the question: what's broken? What needs an upgrade? What do you wish existed but doesn't yet?
We'll keep this running weekly to stay locked in with what you need.