Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
#DMC I really don't want to say, have you ever thought that the project team wants to make the storage function of EVM and boast of its superb technology, so why not make its own public chain compatible with EVM? For example, FIL has FEVM, and FIL's storage function can be directly called through a smart contract to pay the native token as a storage fee. Doesn't the project team often use FIL's technology to step on it? As a result, you can't do it yourself? There are also many public chains that are EVM compatible at the protocol layer. In addition, cross-chain can also not issue coins, and it is possible to interact with the native token and storage function of its own public chain directly on the EVM chain through smart contracts. It can also be used for token mapping, and there are too many ways to do it. But if the project party chooses to issue new coins across chains, and you say that you can't do the above things, or that this is your consideration and choice, then you let the cross-chain go to mining? But no, then what is the purpose? Do you want to sell coins? Does the original chain have a corresponding token freeze? And did the project party lend tens of millions of tokens to several large households for mining? Small retail investors still have to buy tokens at their own expense for staking mining? Isn't this going to be a game? Smash the price of the original chain, drive people to the new chain, and then sell coins to you for mining? It stinks. It's better to cheat on investment every day than to save income, so don't be disgusted by people who make up their positions every week. Or maybe it's a scythe. Since you choose to issue coins across chains, it is said to be a coin, but in fact, it is not for you to cross? There is also such a thing as space, advocating space from beginning to end, who is the space for? Could it be that even if the space is free for people to use, people don't want to use it at all, because what app can they design? Looking at the app of the wallet, the maintenance and development are all outsourced. It's better to get a network disk for people to use.,It's actually said that it's a competitive relationship with other people's web2 cloud storage.,It's just a joke.。 There is also an easter egg, is so-and-so really doing technical support? In the past few days, I have charged more than 10 million coins to the exchange through other accounts, right? Locked up everyone's coins and only let yourself sell, it's really amazing. Another kind reminder, in the past few months, be careful of the new uncles and aunts to protect their rights. Waiting to be unlocked is to accelerate to zero, and it will eventually return to zero.