
A DID identity, or Decentralized Identifier, is a user-controlled digital identity that does not depend on centralized platforms. At its core, it consists of a unique string formatted as “did:method:identifier,” and ownership is proven through a private key.
When you see “DID,” think of it as your decentralized account name. Associated with this identifier is a “DID document,” which lists your public keys (for signature verification) and service endpoints (for discovering your interfaces or messaging channels). Using this information, applications can confirm your ownership of the identity without relying on traditional usernames, passwords, or third-party logins.
The fundamental principle behind DID identity is “identity proof via private key signature and application-side public key verification,” combined with a standardized resolution process that links a DID string to its corresponding public key and service data.
Here, the private/public key pair acts as cryptographic credentials. The private key is like your personal signing tool; the public key serves as the public sample for verification. You sign a challenge message with your private key, and the application verifies this signature with your public key—if it matches, you’re recognized as the DID owner. The DID document serves as an instruction manual for your public key and related services.
DIDs are based on “DID methods.” These methods define how DIDs with different prefixes are created and resolved—e.g., did:key (derived directly from a public key), did:pkh (bound to an on-chain address), did:ion (built on a distributed identifier network). Each method determines where the DID document is stored, and how it’s updated or revoked.
Generating and resolving a DID identity involves several steps—establishing the identifier, publishing the document, and using a resolver to access usage information.
The most common use cases for DID identities are “message signature login” and “proof of qualification.” You use your wallet to sign a challenge message from an application; once verified, you’re logged in or gain access to features.
In DAO governance, DID identities can be tied to voting rights—only those holding specific tokens or credentials are allowed to vote on proposals.
For NFT and content gating scenarios, DIDs can verify if you hold a certain NFT series before granting download or viewing permissions.
In compliant fundraising or proof-of-employment scenarios, DIDs are paired with Verifiable Credentials (VCs)—cryptographically verifiable attestations issued by trusted institutions. For example, you can present a “KYC completed” or “member of institution X” VC to prove eligibility without revealing unnecessary personal data.
DID identities do not require centralized identity providers. Traditional account systems store credentials in platform databases; OAuth relies on third parties like social logins. With DIDs, you directly prove control using your private key—applications only need to verify your signature.
The difference lies in control and portability. With DIDs, your identity can’t be frozen or revoked by any single platform, and you can reuse the same identity and credentials across multiple apps. DIDs also allow for more granular privacy—revealing only necessary credentials rather than an entire profile.
On dApps supporting did:pkh, your on-chain address serves as your DID identity. When connecting Gate’s Web3 wallet, you sign with your address for “challenge login,” and applications recognize your DID identity accordingly.
Within Gate’s Web3 environment, users typically sign authorization requests via wallet signatures and leverage VC validation interfaces to control access to certain features or content. For example, addresses holding specific NFTs can unlock events or airdrops; if VC verification is integrated, you can prove eligibility with minimal data disclosure.
Risk warning: Your wallet’s private key controls your DID identity. Secure backup, use of hardware wallets, or multi-signature schemes can reduce risks of loss or theft.
Leading DID implementations are called “DID methods.” Common examples include did:key (public-key-based, lightweight), did:pkh (binds to on-chain addresses, compatible with Ethereum and other ecosystems), and did:ion (built on distributed identifier networks supporting strong revocation and scalability).
Chain selection focuses on three aspects: resolution availability, cost, and ecosystem compatibility. For example, did:pkh works seamlessly with wallets and dApps in Ethereum ecosystems; scenarios needing high consistency and scalability may consider more mature decentralized identifier networks or Layer 2 solutions for optimal cost and performance balance.
DID identities are moving toward standardization and interoperability. The W3C has formalized the core DID specification as a recommended standard (source: W3C, July 2022), and cross-chain tools and resolvers have been rapidly improving.
Expected future directions include broader wallet integration for DIDs and VCs; mainstream adoption of challenge-signature logins with enhanced privacy proofs; and foundational support for credential revocation and auditing in compliant finance and enterprise environments. Technically, multiple methods will coexist, with cross-network resolution becoming standard practice.
DID identity returns control over identity to users—enabling qualification proof across applications through “private key signatures + verifiable credentials.” Selecting the right DID method and practicing robust key/privacy management are crucial for secure adoption. As standards mature and tooling improves, DIDs will become easier to integrate into wallets and apps—driving adoption in Web3 and broader digital services.
DID identities rely on blockchain for a decentralized, tamper-resistant storage layer that ensures identity authenticity. Traditional systems are managed by central authorities—making them vulnerable to single points of failure or abuse of power. Blockchain’s distributed ledger ensures users retain complete ownership of their identity data, with all changes traceable and verifiable. This user sovereignty is a core advantage of DIDs over conventional ID systems.
Yes—DID identities offer cross-chain compatibility since they adhere to W3C standards rather than being tied to any single blockchain. For example, a DID registered on Ethereum can be recognized and validated on Solana, Polygon, or other chains—much like passports function globally. Actual support depends on whether applications have integrated that DID standard; however, support across major ecosystems is growing rapidly.
DIDs deliver value for both individuals and organizations but serve different needs. Individuals can manage their own identities for cross-platform login and privacy protection; enterprises can use DIDs for employee authentication, supply chain traceability, customer KYC processes, etc. Platforms like Gate are steadily lowering adoption barriers by supporting user authentication via DIDs.
Losing your DID private key means losing control of that identity—there is no central authority to help you recover it (a fundamental trait of blockchain systems). This is why secure management practices (hardware wallets or multi-signature setups) are essential. If you lose access, you must register a new DID; prior history remains on-chain but becomes unmanageable.
To authenticate via a DID identity on Gate:


