Futures
Hundreds of contracts settled in USDT or BTC
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Futures Kickoff
Get prepared for your futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to experience risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Using median and other metrics to measure the valuation level of the convertible bond market seems to have issues?
Is there really meaning in the equal-weighted index and median? With new convertible bonds entering and exiting, and bonds at different prices coming in and out, shouldn’t that affect the index?
After downloading the data post-new regulations, I created scatter plots of 【Remaining Size】 and 【Equal-Weighted Index】. From the chart, it appears that smaller sizes correspond to higher equal-weighted index values. Is the increase due to the convertible bonds themselves rising, or is it because the shrinking size is causing the increase?
When demand exceeds supply, the equal-weighted index naturally rises. So, is it still scientific to use the median, equal-weighted index, to measure whether convertible bonds are high or not?
Feel free to discuss~