Using median and other metrics to measure the valuation level of the convertible bond market seems to have issues?

Is there really meaning in the equal-weighted index and median? With new convertible bonds entering and exiting, and bonds at different prices coming in and out, shouldn’t that affect the index?

After downloading the data post-new regulations, I created scatter plots of 【Remaining Size】 and 【Equal-Weighted Index】. From the chart, it appears that smaller sizes correspond to higher equal-weighted index values. Is the increase due to the convertible bonds themselves rising, or is it because the shrinking size is causing the increase?

When demand exceeds supply, the equal-weighted index naturally rises. So, is it still scientific to use the median, equal-weighted index, to measure whether convertible bonds are high or not?

Feel free to discuss~

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
No comments
  • Pin