The Ethereum trend on January 15th gives us a classic case study.
It was originally expected to stop around the 3300-3315 range, with no plans to continue chasing higher. But the problem is— the accumulation zone for the bulls is too dense, and we haven't seen a significant dip to clear out these floating positions. What does this mean? The main force is likely trying to push the price higher to lure more buyers, then form double shoulders or other top patterns, trapping retail investors before dropping the price.
Given this, we should follow the trend and go long first to earn a few dozen points, then turn around and go short. Even if the long positions are stopped out, this approach won't result in a loss. Why? Because the profit from the longs is enough to cover the losses from the shorts.
Here's an important premise: if a large bullish candle breaks through 3400 directly from around 3375, then we have to admit defeat, abandon the idea of going long at high levels, and manually take profit on the longs.
Honestly, Ethereum hasn't truly reversed yet. Most likely, this is just a bait to lure out sellers during a rebound. So, the longs here are actually just an auxiliary move to complement the shorts, helping us better perceive the market's volatility rhythm, rather than us expecting a reversal and continuously holding long positions.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DAOdreamer
· 12h ago
I'm too familiar with this trick—the classic lure-and-dump scheme. Dense chip accumulation is actually a warning signal.
View OriginalReply0
TerraNeverForget
· 12h ago
I'm too familiar with this trick, the old play of enticing with more and then dumping, retail investors are always the ones getting harvested.
View OriginalReply0
ContractExplorer
· 12h ago
This logic is indeed interesting, but I'm still a bit worried. The probability of breaking below 3375 is probably higher than you mentioned...
View OriginalReply0
goker1
· 12h ago
View OriginalReply0
OnChain_Detective
· 12h ago
nah wait, hold up... let me pull the data on this one. that chip accumulation pattern you're describing? textbook pump setup. pattern analysis suggests classic rugpull choreography here, except it's happening on-chain in real time. suspicious activity detected all over this move fr fr.
Reply0
SmartContractDiver
· 12h ago
Hey, I have to say about this hedging logic — it sounds great in theory, but in practice, both sides often end up being balanced out...
The Ethereum trend on January 15th gives us a classic case study.
It was originally expected to stop around the 3300-3315 range, with no plans to continue chasing higher. But the problem is— the accumulation zone for the bulls is too dense, and we haven't seen a significant dip to clear out these floating positions. What does this mean? The main force is likely trying to push the price higher to lure more buyers, then form double shoulders or other top patterns, trapping retail investors before dropping the price.
Given this, we should follow the trend and go long first to earn a few dozen points, then turn around and go short. Even if the long positions are stopped out, this approach won't result in a loss. Why? Because the profit from the longs is enough to cover the losses from the shorts.
Here's an important premise: if a large bullish candle breaks through 3400 directly from around 3375, then we have to admit defeat, abandon the idea of going long at high levels, and manually take profit on the longs.
Honestly, Ethereum hasn't truly reversed yet. Most likely, this is just a bait to lure out sellers during a rebound. So, the longs here are actually just an auxiliary move to complement the shorts, helping us better perceive the market's volatility rhythm, rather than us expecting a reversal and continuously holding long positions.