Sam might claim he holds no OpenAI stock, but the plot thickens when you look at his portfolio in the company's partners. Smart move or just playing the angles?

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ImaginaryWhalevip
· 2h ago
A typical case of the left hand doing the opposite of the right hand; I've seen this trick way too many times...
View OriginalReply0
MEVSupportGroupvip
· 2h ago
This strategy is quite deep, it looks like just playing word games. No direct shareholding, instead transferring benefits from partners, truly clever...
View OriginalReply0
WealthCoffeevip
· 2h ago
Hmm... I see through this tactic. On the surface, they say they don't hold shares, but then they lay in wait at related parties. Truly skilled at playing the game.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichDetectorvip
· 2h ago
Ah, you're playing word games again. Not holding shares actually means indirectly holding through the partner’s investment portfolio. How awkward.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropJunkievip
· 2h ago
Another "I don't have" trick... well, actually I do
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)