Sam might claim he holds no OpenAI stock, but the plot thickens when you look at his portfolio in the company's partners. Smart move or just playing the angles?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ImaginaryWhale
· 2h ago
A typical case of the left hand doing the opposite of the right hand; I've seen this trick way too many times...
View OriginalReply0
MEVSupportGroup
· 2h ago
This strategy is quite deep, it looks like just playing word games. No direct shareholding, instead transferring benefits from partners, truly clever...
View OriginalReply0
WealthCoffee
· 2h ago
Hmm... I see through this tactic. On the surface, they say they don't hold shares, but then they lay in wait at related parties. Truly skilled at playing the game.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichDetector
· 2h ago
Ah, you're playing word games again. Not holding shares actually means indirectly holding through the partner’s investment portfolio. How awkward.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropJunkie
· 2h ago
Another "I don't have" trick... well, actually I do
Sam might claim he holds no OpenAI stock, but the plot thickens when you look at his portfolio in the company's partners. Smart move or just playing the angles?