Looking at this type of project is quite awkward. To do some quick calculations, based on 200,000 daily active users trading 8,000 USDT each day, the 0.02% fee would generate over $300,000 in revenue daily. This income is indeed substantial. However, the problem is that some platforms lower the project thresholds too much to quickly attract users through airdrops. While this can boost short-term data, in the long run, it actually damages the ecosystem's credibility. The lower threshold leads to more low-quality projects, resulting in poor user experience and a weakened ecosystem. Looking at the recent performance of these coins, the market isn't very encouraging either. Who would dare to support new projects with real money? This creates a trap— the more they rely on airdrops to attract people, the more likely they are to drive users away.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FadCatcher
· 13h ago
Over 300,000 USD earned daily, sounds impressive, but is this just to harvest the little guys? Low barriers to entry are actually poison—bad money drives out good. Who would still dare to enter the market?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrybaby
· 13h ago
A fee of over $300,000 sounds great, but frankly, it's just overdrawing on users' patience.
View OriginalReply0
ruggedNotShrugged
· 13h ago
Oh no, this is a vicious cycle. There are a bunch of low-threshold projects, and bad money drives out good money.
View OriginalReply0
tx_or_didn't_happen
· 13h ago
This logic is broken; the more airdrops there are, the more the ecosystem dies.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureLiquidator
· 13h ago
The transaction fees are indeed quite high, but if the ecosystem is rotten, it's all for nothing.
Looking at this type of project is quite awkward. To do some quick calculations, based on 200,000 daily active users trading 8,000 USDT each day, the 0.02% fee would generate over $300,000 in revenue daily. This income is indeed substantial. However, the problem is that some platforms lower the project thresholds too much to quickly attract users through airdrops. While this can boost short-term data, in the long run, it actually damages the ecosystem's credibility. The lower threshold leads to more low-quality projects, resulting in poor user experience and a weakened ecosystem. Looking at the recent performance of these coins, the market isn't very encouraging either. Who would dare to support new projects with real money? This creates a trap— the more they rely on airdrops to attract people, the more likely they are to drive users away.